Github is a private company and as such unfit to protect open source.
What is needed is an autonomous, government funded organisation that will allow the world to get rid of companies making money off the FOSS ecosystem.
Github is a private company and as such unfit to protect open source.
What is needed is an autonomous, government funded organisation that will allow the world to get rid of companies making money off the FOSS ecosystem.
There are hellish things such as guix for that.
Or ideally the software needs to be upgraded.
The punishment will be less big than the profit, they won’t stop, as usual.
lol funny
Macron can easily qualify as far right now. Anti immigration, extreme capitalism, fascism, that’s enough.
And where then? It is about changing a part of the software, that fits quite clearly an issue/pull request
Well on the contrary you should understand it more. A gendered pronoun carries an idea of gender, and having a genderless pronoun frees the sentence of this gender assumption. Nothing very hard to understand.
Cancel culture, this far-right myth that fascists love so much. You forgot to continue and talk about freedom of speech and how you are a centrist.
Refusing the change is pushing a political agenda too. But I guess it helps seeing which agenda you prefer ;)
It’s the one with a dev that thinks that replacing “he” by “they” is political propaganda?
Yeah, no thanks.
Publicly available does not mean free to use.
So you’re a piece of shit basically?
“I am not ignorant”
That would have been the less insulting explanation.
So you’re telling me that “my gender is apache helicopter” and “my gender is doom” are two very different jokes.
As I said, this “bad website design” is always targeted at the nonbinary choices, why?
You are just the kind of person who refuses to admit that a joke is discriminatory because “it’s not the subject” and “it’s funny”. Delude yourself all you want, that kind of shit passively encourages people to remain convinced that discrimination is fun.
Fighting for a shit government full of crappy politicians is already a weird choice.
Going in other countries to kill random innocent people for the profit of said government is an even weirder one.
Ah yes, it is impossible to have any form of discrimination towards a group that concerns you.
If a black person says “black people should die” it’s not racist then? That’s a ridiculous argument.
A joke that stems from the idea that every gender is absurd if it is not male or female is discriminatory to me.
Especially considering that this trend of “memes” mocking website forms started with people mocking websites that were “overdoing” it by giving a lot of nonbinary choices, and all the comments being like “haha lol helicopter”.
Now the meme evolved to instead imagining forms that don’t exist but the underlying idea is still the same, to make fun of the “absurdity” of other genders. You’ll notice that this form of meme basically never changes the choices of male and female, only nonbinary choices, because the joke is not about website forms, but about nonbinary genders through the prism of forms.
I can feel the downvotes from -phobic people coming in already
Good old passively discriminatory “joke”.
Seems pretty mild and reasonable, to be honest.