• WhatTrees@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    My dude, it’s been the same conversation this whole time. “People can’t talk about TS” because the government hides information about it and bans memorial services. You’ve been pedantic about this for a while now but this is another level.

    I like that the end of this road is just an attempt to shuffle me off to someone else who you hope could defend your position since you apparently can’t. You can stop responding if you like, I have no idea why you keep responding but not providing any evidence for your claims. I’ll keep asking you for evidence as long as it takes for you to either provide it, admit that you don’t have a good reason to believe it, or walk away as you’ve always been free to do.

    I know you don’t care, that’s been obvious this whole time even though you keep responding, but I don’t for a moment believe you’re too dumb to understand the connection or relevance. You’ve only been answering the questions you want to answer because that’s easy but have pretty much always refused to answer the hard questions. You’ve been avoiding the questions that would highlight exactly how preposterous your claim was using identical logic to talk about other countries. You’ve refused to supply evidence unless I agree to accept it first. You’ve shifted the goalposts from is sinophobic and an anti China buzzword to has more than 0 racist underpinnings, a standard you know damn well you don’t apply to other countries.

    I just don’t understand why you have such a strong need to protect an authoritarian government from criticism. China isn’t smol bean and they don’t need you to white-knight for them. They are a big-boy country who can handle criticisms of their actions. I don’t care if their people faced oppression, the government doesn’t get a pass for oppressing their citizens. Even if you think the criticism isn’t true, I hope you can see how wrong and determental it is to call it sinophobic. It’s a transparent attempt to co-opt liberal idpol to cover for the actions of a government you’ve decided you like. And you’ll have to forgive me for not believing your “trust me bro someone else can totally prove this to you.”

    • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s not the end of this road, it’s the beginning too.

      I began by saying that I don’t have any interest in engaging with your questions. If you want someone to talk with you about them then talk to someone else.

      I am again going to ignore most of what you wrote and pick what I want to respond to:

      Do you think your unwillingness to accept Chinese people talking in their own words about tiannamen and your denial that it’s sinophobic to say they can’t are related?

        • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Chinese people talking about tiannamen is literally a direct refutation of the claim that they can’t do so.

          It is as related to that claim as any thing could possibly be.

          • WhatTrees@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            We already covered this multiple times. The claim is they can’t because of government actions that you refuse to prove don’t happen. Are you now backing off the other part altogether and saying the only thing you’ll defend is that some Chinese people have said things about TS?

            • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I never said that. You did. I don’t care about disproving the claims you make. I especially don’t care to attempt to disprove a negative statement since it’s pretty fraught.

              That idea, that government action prevents Chinese people from speaking about tiannamen rests on Chinese people not speaking about tiannamen. That second part, the one your claim rests on, is what I dispute and what I made a post about before even your first reply.

              I asked you if you’d accept Chinese people speaking about tiannamen as evidence of my claim and you said (and I’m paraphrasing here, because enumerating all the ways you said the Chinese people would have to be in line with the western story in order for you to accept that evidence amounts to the same outcome) no.

              It seems like all you care about is government restriction of speech. When is it acceptable for a government to restrict speech?

              • WhatTrees@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                So then, no evidence that they don’t attempt to hide the information or ban people from holding memorial services? You could provide evidence that the government allows memorial services, or you could prove that the specific claims made in the evidence I gave you are incorrect. For example, you could show that access to the relevant wiki pages and Google searches are not blocked in China. None of this is proving a negative or an impossibly high bar to meet.

                • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  So I, as I said before multiple times, don’t care what you think or about the questions you’re asking.

                  You seem to care a lot though, so I’ll pose my last question again: when is it acceptable for a government to restrict speech?