• SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Why aren’t these guys in jail? Seriously. I mean, I know the theory of the rule of law and all, but even our widely-acclaimed greatest president suspended habeas corpus when insurgent seditionists tried to overthrow the Union.

      • CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        5 months ago

        it’s still unfathomable that trump was “allowed” (I know it was “legal”, don’t point that out) to pardon his literal partners-in-crime. He basically has already self-pardoned himself by proxy by allowing these traitors to walk free.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m not sure if I’m joking. In any case, the writ of habeas corpus is the legal tool that a court can theoretically use to compel the appearance of a prisoner before it. It is the legal doctrine that underlies the right to trial, and I say “theoretically” because courts rarely need to issue one; it’s just standard procedure to bring people to court to face charges.

        By suspending it, Abraham Lincoln could detain those people he deemed dangerous seditionists indefinitely, because the detainees would have to go to court to challenge their detention, and there was no way to get to court. The effect of suspending it again is that it wouldn’t matter that Baboon (autocorrect and I’m leaving it) and Stone were pardoned, or that there were even criminal charges.

        Lincoln did it, George W. Bush did it. Barack Obama did it. The Constitution contains a clause which allows it to be suspended due to rebellion or threats to public safety. It’s a dangerous thing to allow a president to do, but the MAGA danger might be greater.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        As in my other reply, the Constitution allows the suspension of habeas corpus in cases of rebellion or threats to public safety, and without that writ, charges and sentences are irrelevant.

        • rsuri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          The Supreme Court has held that the Constitution contains a right to habeas corpus in Boumedine v. Bush. The Lincoln thing was never fully litigated and was probably unconstitutional.

    • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Throughout human history, laws have never stopped conservatism. Jails have never stopped conservatism. Pacifism has never stopped conservatism. Only force has ever stopped conservatism. Only force.

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          People get called that when they’re pretending to be far left while urging everyone to take the exact actions the Repubs want them to take.

            • pyre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              that would be people who are essentially voting for trump, so yeah, why not.

            • Censored@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Tankie is the pro-authoritarian left. The Stalinists essentially. The ones who think it’s appropriate to send in the tanks to quell a socialist or communist uprising because it has a tint of democracy in it, which may cause their strong leader to lose dictatorial power.

        • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Tankies are literal authoritarians. People say they’re “authoritarian communists,” which ignores they’re mostly Maoists or Stalinists, both of whom were closer to fascism than the left. It sort of ignores the basic premise of communism or even socialism to have a single authoritarian ruler. Kind of like how the Nazis called themselves socialists. I guess they were a workers’ party to start, but I don’t think you can reasonably conflate their ideology with the tenets of socialism.

          • nyctre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            No, you don’t understand. The problem is that those people haven’t had enough time to bring upon real communism. Real communism hasn’t been reached yet. They want to let the Maos and Stalins of the world have enough time to reach communism. Things will surely be different with the next guy.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      That’s only if he gets away with probation. Due to him talking with felons all day every day and the fact that he’s publicly shown ALL of the contempt (in both the colloquial and legal sense of the word) of the court and continues to do so, that’s unlikely in spite of the kid gloves he’s being treated with.

      My guess is he gets community service and I hope it involves picking up thrash while wearing a jumpsuit that matches his skin.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m a Republican that does their own Research and even though the election hasn’t happened yet I ALREADY KNOW TRUMP LOST UNFAIRLY because of Sleepy Joe Biden being UNFAIR!

  • Xaphanos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    5 months ago

    I get fundraising texts occasionally. I don’t know why. But the one that came on the heels of the conviction had a section of fine print declaring what the money was for. It included a “recount challenge fund”. This is in the open.

    • 242@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well, given how broke the Republican Party is they’re probably still paying off the lawyers from their failed challenges from 2020. But they’re also planning on doing it again.

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I wouldn’t call locking them in a kneeled position while people throw rotten food at them “violent,” necessarily.

      But I’d love to see it happen anyway.

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Once they are already in the position it wouldn’t be too hard to move them to the guillotine.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    5 months ago

    I wonder if they’re actually dumb enough to try the false electors scheme twice in a row?

    They got caught are being convicted right now for doing it in 2020, and everybody is expecting it now.

    • m13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      5 months ago

      Whatever the result they’re going to keep trying again. Why wouldn’t they when there are virtually no consequences? Fascists don’t give a damn about what election results say, they’re always going to try to gain power by any means necessary.

    • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      The trials are being sandbagged by republican judges, nobody is actually getting punished for trying to steal the election. They’re gonna do it again.

  • 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Of course the orange turd is going to challenge it, this shouldn’t surprise anyone. He wasn’t even given a slap on the wrist for inciting a mob to try to overthrow the government. Why wouldn’t he try again?

    Stone is just a useful idiot which also shouldn’t surprise anyone.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 months ago

    “That may not be necessary,” Stone continued. “There are technical, legal steps we have to take to try to have a more honest election.”

    Fixed it: “That may not be necessary,” Stone continued. “There are technical, legal steps we have to take to try to have the appearance of a more honest election.”

    Stone noted during the conversation that the Trump campaign is attempting to change state voting laws and plans to immediately file a number of lawsuits seeking to change the results should the former president lose again, as Trump allies did in Michigan and several other states in 2020.

    This is looking grim. We might have to actually fight on this one. Sigh…

    • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s the newest ARG, a Get Out / The Purge crossover where half the population pretends laws don’t exist and the other half has to try to keep their democratic institutions! Hijinks will ensue in this surreal tragicomedy Asshole Reality Game, brought to you by Koch Brothers ©!

  • D1G17AL@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t know if anyone else has pointed this out, in this photo especially, Roger Stone looks like a caricature of Mr. Burns from The Simpsons.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Roger Stone looks like a caricature of Mr. Burns from The Simpsons.

      Who is himself a caricature of an old and evil rich man. If the shoe fits…

      Btw, remember when he showed up to the inauguration looking like a literal Batman villain?