Initial distribution was through a captcha-protected crypto ‘faucet’. The faucet is still up. Did the developers keep a large part of the coins themselves? I’ve never heard that.
Initial distribution was through a captcha-protected crypto ‘faucet’. The faucet is still up. Did the developers keep a large part of the coins themselves? I’ve never heard that.
No, because I’m not a trader. It’s not all about the exchange rate for me, but about the utility of the coin.
Most coins exist because other coins exist. Nano and Monero not necessarily.
I only like two cryptocurrencies.
Nano: free transactions, each wallet runs it’s own blockchain, so it’s got no negative impact on the environment.
Monero: allows for anonymous transfers
Right. But if things do start to cost money, should that be stopped by laws?
Why’s that?
I see, thanks.
Dutch court convicts engieneer, not Dutch engieneer gets convicted.
Honest question, what do you mean by this? What’s the difference really?
Both based on Bing’s search engine