Why?

I installed it based on your recommendation and it is full with macropayments.

You might be interested in reproducible-builds.org or f-droid.org/en/docs/Reproducible_Builds

Visibility :/

I am no dev of rust.

My guess:

• they didn’t want to scare anyone.
• They really think that MIT is free and that anyone shall do with it whatever they like. They are not afraid that someone takes the rust code base and produces a proprietary fork and make money from it.

You could say that, yes.

It makes sense to suggest MIT license for a MIT project

MIT is better than proprietary. MIT does not force you to not make your project free.

It’s kind of the default in the docs

https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/manifest.html?highlight=License#the-license-and-license-file-fields

SPDX license expressions support AND and OR operators to combine multiple licenses.1

  [package]
   # ...
  license = "MIT OR Apache-2.0"

Using OR indicates the user may choose either license. Using AND indicates the user must comply with both licenses simultaneously. The WITH operator indicates a license with a special exception. Some examples:

MIT OR Apache-2.0
LGPL-2.1-only AND MIT AND BSD-2-Clause
GPL-2.0-or-later WITH Bison-exception-2.2

When I started out (I don’t write Rust but other languages), in my first years, I liked gpl and after a couple of years I got to know MIT and I started using that because I thought it is “more free”. I wasn’t aware of the consequences immediately. Once I read the GNU philosophy and started reading more about free software, I started using gplv3 again

I can recommend cockpit for managing the firewall

I was curious. Not mocking you :)

I could imagine living in a valley, or an alpine hut.

What’s a/your use case?

I run grapheneos since a couple of years and I love it.

People should pay for foss. Donations are oftentimes welcome

A really cool app is wanderer https://github.com/Flomp/wanderer

It’s not directly what you asked but it is cool

To me, it’s cooler than komoot and outdooractive but it’s not “social” consumer ready

Thx, thats not it

Yes, it works with nginxproxymanager. There’s probably something going on with selinux - I may disable it the next time to test the assumption.

Thanks. For now, I spend too much time with it. I’ll try some other time again.

Sorry for not having expressed what I did. I wrote a podman compose file, pulled the caddy image, wrote a caddyfile, started it and tried to connect to a service via subdomain.domain.tld .

The caddyfile contains my http and tls ports and the domain and ip for the reverse proxy routing according to the docs.

The result is no log entry in caddy and no result in the browser or curl.

Thx for offering your help.

If I would know, I could debug it, but I don’t know where the problem is. I assume the problem is somewhere with podman or selinux

It doesn’t work. I can’t manage to debug it.

Fedora server. Podman. Selinux. Port 8443. Ipv4.

I’d be happy to switch if I had a good tutorial for caddy. Unfortunately I couldn’t find one.

Thanks!

I use nginxproxymanager, I’ll try to find something similar (I couldn’t find something directly)