captcha [any]

Thats assuming Yemen is capable of stopping all israeli traffic through the red sea. Best they can do is make it risky, which is effective, but not total. Pretty sure the US has bases in Djbouti for this exact reason.

Is that all from Yemen pratrolling aden or has Egypt blockaded them from the Suez?

Due to these attacks, many Israeli commercial ships have been forced to change their routes with Israel’s Eilat port recording around 85% loss in its business according to the media reports. The Houthi-led government in Yemen has also fired missiles and drones targeting Eilat.

Above cites almayadeen which cites israeli channel 13, which is an internet dead end.

Wiki says its not a major port compared to the Mediterranean ports. It doesnt even have a rail line…

Iran

If you have an always on compute: Syncthing. Think google drive or Dropbox but with as many different folders and devices as you want.

If you’re already on linux: KDE connect, even if you’re not on KDE. Neat little pocket knife of ways to connect to your computer from your phone.

nationalize … agriculture

🚨LAND REFORM ALERT🚨

🚨LAND REFORM ALERT🚨

🚨LAND REFORM ALERT🚨

Do not worry, the CIA is contracting death squads to secure democracy in your country as we speak.

cronyism

This is like saying feudalism would be fine if you could get rid of the nepotism.

Degrowth in absense of socialism is nonsense but it is necessary. Lazy socialism is the way.

The crisis wasnt started the donbass seceded. The crisis started because there was a coup in keiv. The new government was shelling the donbass long before the invasion. None of that happened in your example.

Scrum is agile that puts the needs of management first.

This makes your analogy make less sense. No nazi party came to power in the donbass. In fact they precieved that had happened in keiv and seceded.

Because its not relevant. It HAPPENS to be the case now,

It IS relevant because its the fundamental reason why we can say we’ll get positive outcomes from this case. It was even baked into your explanation “ending global imperialism”.

but the framing of “big vs small” is very ignorant

“Framing” is ambiguous and I’m ignoring that,

Please elaborate because as far as I see you just dont like that framing because you think its counter productive messaging, not because its wrong.

We want the larger capitalist empire to loose to the smaller capitalist empire because that leads to better outcomes. Saying otherwise is telling half truths at best.

2006, a fine vintage. Bush was still president.

There’s a concept called “critical support”, which most “tankies” are practicing. You have criticism of a side but its the lesser evil so you support it despite your criticism. You won’t hear much of that criticism publicly though because that’s counterproductive.

Like if I want the US to recognize the DPRK as a sovereign state so we can at least begin discussing Korean reunification, why would I bother mentioning my criticism of Juche?

“Woke” on foreign policy…

Xi first started geting so much hate from the west because he actually started purging communist party members for being too involved in the private sector. If he was encouraging the bourgeoisification of the CPC he would be hailed by the west.

I wonder how the government of nk earned those sanctions?

Please enlighten me on why you think that is?

Also do you think the DPRK is a real sovreign nation?

This loser didn’t buy the tazer.