The article contains a number of what seems to assurances from different groups that this was unplanned and a bahaviour not representative of these people as a group. It’s notable, however, that multiple people seem to have been able to sing along.
Quite literally, I would say.
Everyone having AC is a good way of accelerating climate change
Well of course it will be different. One has to do with another author publishing questionable data and the other would be related to misunderstanding of someone else’s published data. In this case, the use of AI in writing is implied to result in authors not being in control of what they themselves publish.
All of these are bad but do not necessarily arise on purpose. But let’s not add ways to muddy the already mudied waters of science.
Please open a book. Remember: it only counts if it contains more sentences than pictures.