• 0 Posts
  • 11 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle

  • so instance mods will be incentivized to comply with Facebook’s demands to attract new users and maintain their current one

    This is where your argument falls apart. Why? There is no incentive for instance mods to want to grow their instances exponentially.

    If Facebook’s ActivityPub grows to be incompatible with the existing implementation, who cares? So what if you run a Mastodon instance and aren’t getting millions of new users a day?

    This is much ado about nothing. While there is a shared platform, enjoy the ride, and if they don’t want to play by your rules anymore, there’s no harm to anyone in saying goodbye and staying your course.



  • Lemmino@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldhow to block meta from mastodon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As far as (1) goes, 90% of the content on Lemmy is just a Lemmy circlejerk, the remaining 10% is memes. What influx of “low effort content” could possibly make the discussions on Lemmy worse than they already are?

    As far as (2) goes, you realize your data on Lemmy is open to everyone to scrape, not just Meta? Every single one of your upvotes is public.


  • Lemmino@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldhow to block meta from mastodon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are no users “exploring open source alternatives.” Have you seen the Lemmy signup flow? It’s a complete shitshow that probably turns away 95% of people to begin with.

    Facebook almost certainly doesn’t see Lemmy and Mastodon as a threat or competitor. They adopted ActivityPub because it’s nice, and they’ll move on as they need to scale, and Lemmy and Mastodon will continue to survive as they always have.




  • Lemmino@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldhow to block meta from mastodon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is absurd to think XMPP would have gained traction without Google. And it is an objectively shitty protocol, so Google dropping it was the right move. It is kind of weird to see people holding up Google dropping XMPP as some horrifying example of embrace, extend, extinguish, when anyone that’s actually developed software with the protocol wants it to die in a burning fire.