so it’s not the “electric” part that’s the problem in norway
it’s still better than combustion engines
stupid headline!
so it’s not the “electric” part that’s the problem in norway
it’s still better than combustion engines
stupid headline!
yes, it’s a good movie and Ulrich Mühe was simply brilliant. (sadly he died shortly therafter)
and yes, it was similar to how some things that might have happened during GDR
it’s still not fitting content for a privacy sub
In most cases I’d be the first to support your idea.
but here it actually blocked malware?
how did OP not end up with two signal apps then?
by that popup blocking him from installing the wrong one?
that’s your opinion (I share it)
but that totally isn’t a valid response that’s helping OP in any way.
I’ve been using it for like 3 years now on my Fairphone FP3(somewhat-plus)
It’s pretty usable.
But damn! That name is ridiculously bad.
They took “de-googled” so far that you can’t even “google” the project by it’s name. /s
yes I did.
It’s a bit low on facts. But it makes up for it with a lot conspiracy stuff.
well that and it’s different chemistry (lead vs lithium)
…aaaand EVs have those old lead-acid batteries too. (btw: we should finally ditch those for LiFePo or similar)
Nothing.
There’s nothing out there.
Just sea and birds and fish.
So, how would you do that on a ship built to be filled by two ramps?
on a ship of that type? yes, I do.
and look surprisingly similar to the one in those articles :D
how do you think those cars were loaded into the ship? by crane?
Small cars from the 80s/90s are a death trap even at slow speeds and making them safe requires them to be bigger
it’s probably not the 90s you’re thinking about.
90s cars had airbags, large crumple zones and seat belts. Those were pretty safe already. Maybe you are thinking 60s and 70s?
Yes, 90s cars were fucked if hit by 3t of steel at 180km/h, yes. But so are current cars.
And less heavy cars that run into you, made less safety needed. So if we were to build only light (say sub 1t and driving 80km/h max) cars to modern standards, we would all be way better off. But people are assholes, so that won’t happen.
No. Out of the environment!
So it’s no longer in an environment.
I mean statistics are clear on that one… :D
totally correct
If you read the actual article by a journalist they don’t say it’s a certainty. Maybe the problem is people like you who can’t tell a journalist from a random guy.
did you even read what I wrote?
I specifically said that journalists are writing “there’s no proof that it wasn’t” and that other people are reading “it was” into it.
It’s exactly that. People are unable to read/understand.
yeah, I get that.
I have no problem with the article itself - the headline is still stupid though.