I know perplexity.ai, but don’t think it’s “open source privacy respecting”
I know perplexity.ai, but don’t think it’s “open source privacy respecting”
And for the creation of this thought water was also involved; assuming this was indeed a showerthougt
Big beards can alter facial recognition and obscure expressions, making someone look more unpredictable or wild to observers.
I’m no expert but I wonder if where there’s limited space for traditional sewage treatment plants, wastewater is just transported through a network of sewer lines to centralized treatment facilities? 🤔
This would allow the treatment plants to be located further inland.
Alternaively I guess they could employ on-site treatment technologies that can be incorporated into the building’s infrastructure 🤔
But like I said I ain’t no expert and just speculating 😅
I don’t think so. If you look at Mastodon it could actually keep most of its users and still seems to be growing.
Of course I don’t know what the future holds for us.
An academic book about emojis that can’t include emojis? That’s ironic and frustrating. Makes me sad that we live in a world where copyright hinders education and discussion 🙈
Here is a Tl;Dr for the ones who don’t want to click the link:
Oxford professor Jieun Kiaer published an academic book called “Emoji Speak: Communications and Behaviours on Social Media,” exploring how emojis are used across different cultures and ages, and considering their future in digital communication.
Although the book discusses emojis in detail, Kiaer was unable to include actual images of many emojis due to copyright concerns, despite the fact that these symbols are ubiquitous in social media spaces, which are almost entirely copyright-free.
Instead of using actual emojis, Kiaer hired an artist, Loli Kim, to draw similar representations, illustrating the barriers that exist between the online and offline worlds concerning copyright.
The inability to use emojis in the book, even in an academic context, highlights the complications and absurdity of modern copyright laws, which some argue could have constituted a fair use situation.
I need a remind me bot now…
What a breathtaking view! Thanks for sharing this piece of Italy’s natural beauty 🥰
Wait, wtf… Volkswagen killed monkeys in emission tests?
Holy fuck you are right. Wtf is wrong with people…
My guess is most airlines have clauses in their terms and conditions that allow them to change the aircraft type without prior notice. Pretty sure their lawyers would argue that this is considered a management right for operational reasons.
But I’m no expert 🙃