Sure it does. All they have to do is fire the CEO and they’ll have so much more money.
Sure it does. All they have to do is fire the CEO and they’ll have so much more money.
The majority of dumb stuff in Javascript is that it has some counterintuitive way of doing something that it shouldn’t do at all, so only teaching the good parts works. So teaching just the good parts is pretty reasonable.
In Python you put it in a multiline string, since it has those but not multiline comments.
But that’s mostly labor humans were doing anyway.
They were correct on both counts. Those aren’t real pronouns, and they aren’t calling them that.
What’s the normal amount of over budget and behind schedule?
Does karma change that? We still have upvotes and downvotes, and you can sort comments by how well they do, and mods can still ban people not only from a community, but from a whole instance.
It’s nothing inherent to the word. Words mean what people use it to mean. If racist people said “African American” and non-racist people said the n-word, then saying “African American” would basically be announcing you’re racist.
It’s not necessarily a bad idea to lower their standards in general, but it seems unfair to reject a man on the basis that he’s too weak when they would have accepted a woman that’s just as strong. If strength matters, then only the few women who are strong enough should be let in. If it doesn’t matter, then men shouldn’t be rejected for not being strong enough.
How often do they get two candidates that are exactly equal? If they’re giving a benefit to people underrepresented, it needs to be worth something.
And we’ve been constantly lowering standards, unrelated to affirmative action. There was a time when being a high-school graduate meant something. Now it’s easy to get through college, and completely necessary because if you don’t people will assume you’re the sort of person who can’t even get through college.
There is a set of people who are frequently subject to racism in the US. How should we refer to them?
If I’m typing on a computer keyboard, typing words is easier than random letters, but on a phone it doesn’t make much of a difference. What I end up doing is typing my passphrase into my password manager on the computer, and then typing the password on there into my phone.
I do have a password manager app for my phone, but then I have to type the whole passphrase into it so I don’t use it unless necessary.
Some of them are broken by quantum computers, but not all of them. For example, SHA256. You can use Grover’s algorithm to take sqrt(n) steps to check n possible passwords, which on the one hand means it can be billions of times faster, but on the other hand, you just need to double the length of the password to get the same security vs quantum computers. Also, this is the first I’ve heard of a hash that uses a quantum computer. Do you have a source? Hashes need to be deterministic, and quantum computers aren’t, so that doesn’t seem like it would work very well.
Maybe you’re getting mixed up with using quantum encryption to get around quantum computers breaking common encryption algorithms?
Still frustrating. I generally try to make my passwords all lowercase in case I need to type them (especially on a phone). But a lot of places don’t allow that.
Your AI achieved superintelligence and achieved the singularity, and you think your startup is going great, but then trillions of years later it fails due to the heat death of the universe.
I disagree. There will definitely be porn ones that make it, but there’s a lot of AI porn startups.
Personally I prefer how on Reddit you can get really specific communities. Like for tsundere sharks, or bread stapled to trees.
Simply containing each number sequence is a significantly weaker property than having them all occur at the right frequency. Still, while nobody has proven it, it’s generally expected to be true.