• Num10ck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    wikipedia says 20 to 40 million people would be without electricity for between 16 days and 1-2 years.

    • 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      1-2 years.

      I worked for an electric utility for nearly 2 decades and now am a consultant helping power companies with grid modernization. This is the part that terrifies me, we are WOEFULLY unprepared for an event like this. A number of times over the years a strategic transformer reserve has been floated to congress with no movement. Even things like a large scale, coordinated attack against a bunch of substations at once could cripple the US power grid for months or even years. Transformer lead-times can be as long at 70 weeks last I knew. Obviously, in the event of a large-scale event the government could step in and throw resources to speed that up but it would be FAR better to have a ready-to-go supply we could draw from.

      • Num10ck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        what i wonder is this something that can be solved without government long range wisdom? like could you start a business stockpiling these things and being the only game in town when theres a disaster? or are the disasters so rare and the price gouging so limited that it would be a bad business move to sit on a square mile of these somewhere inexpensive and safe?

        • 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Great question, and I should have probably clarified my response. There are transformers, the “cans” you see on utility poles. Then there are transformers, the “big boys” in substations. This is one of the better pics I can find on Google, oddly enough it links to an article about how easy it is to disable a substation by shooting out the transformer: https://stopfossilfuels.org/electric-grid/shooting-transformers-disables-substations/buckskin-substation-transformer-shooting.jpg

          The cans you see on poles are relatively ubiquitous and fairly easy to source. The big boys in the substations are the ones with the huge lead times and large cost. Stockpiling them as a business would be a loosing venture. It would be unlikely you would have a customer locally and transporting them is expensive owing to the weight/size.

          • MySNsucks923@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            As someone who works for a large utility company on the distribution side, the small ones on poles or in underground neighborhoods are still tough to get with backorders causing delays in projects. It’s gotten a lot better, but it’s still slow on them.

    • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I know amateur radio operators who have emergency equipment stashed in containers designed to keep the radiation out so they have a backup in case literally everything goes down.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Honestly that’s surprisingly low. I mean I wouldn’t want to be part of that group, but that’s perhaps 10% of the US population.

      I’m actually a bit reassured that a Carrington event wouldn’t be even more devastating.

      • Num10ck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        or maybe they don’t want the population to freak out about it and demand wisdom and real security from leadership?

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Lol, well, you’re not wrong.

          Definitely need to evaluate the source of that info.

          On the one hand, I’d think engineers would bring these issues up, and have ideas how to mitigate risks, in any industry that could be affected (especially power/telecom, since they affect every utility). On the other hand, I can also see management deciding to pay lip service to the identified risks.