LOS ANGELES (AP) — A new California law that bans people from carrying firearms in most public places was once again blocked from taking effect Saturday as a court case challenging it continues.

A 9th Circuit Court of Appeals panel dissolved a temporary hold on a lower court injunction blocking the law. The hold was issued by a different 9th Circuit panel and had allowed the law to go into effect Jan. 1.

Saturday’s decision keeps in place a Dec. 20 ruling by U.S. District Judge Cormac Carney blocking the law. Carney said that it violates the Second Amendment and that gun rights groups would likely prevail in proving it unconstitutional.

The law, signed by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, prohibits people from carrying concealed guns in 26 types of places including public parks and playgrounds, churches, banks and zoos. The ban applies regardless of whether a person has a concealed carry permit.

  • quindraco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    All of those things are things that cause real, direct harms, with speech as the weapon.

    Neither Federal nor State legislators - nor judges - care whether or not a crime is victimless. See e.g. the War on Drugs.

    Also, defamation is a tort, not a crime.

    That makes defamatory speech easier to restrict by reducing the plaintiff’s burden of proof.

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Defamation is also a 3-pronged test, assuming that you aren’t talking about a public figure. It needs to be false (truth is an absolute defense against defamation), you need to have either known that it was false, or have had reckless indifference to the truth, and you need to have caused some kind of measurable harm (and hurting your feelings isn’t a measurable harm). All of that is played out against a field of lawyers in a civil suit that charge by the hour. Defamation is actually quite challenging to win in the US, unless the person that is alleging defamation has a lot of money to spend on attorneys to buy the defendant.