• SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      11 months ago

      Which sucked that they pulled it down, cause holy fuck was it hilarious watching that thing get vandalized. Pride colors was always a classic go to.

    • Doombot1@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      You just had to tell us, didn’t you? /s, and that’s good news on the second point

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Sadly, there’s still a giant carving honoring the Confederacy on a big cliff in Atlanta for all to see. 90 feet tall. And it was definitely part of their heritage because it was completed in… 1972.

      If there was ever a good reason for the invention of dynamite…

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Every monument should fall. The only reason to honor Bob Lee is because he’s responsible for more dead slavers than any three Union generals.

  • Kokesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is so beautiful! Can you imagine all the degenerates on the ceremony seeing this for the first time?

    • Smeagol666@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Even the racist assholes who worshipped him probably cringed or giggled when they first saw it.

  • moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 months ago
    “The most perfidious way of harming a cause consists of defending it deliberately with faulty arguments.”

    I considered switching ‘perfidious’ to a word most people have actually heard of, but I decided against it.

  • DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Literally just listened to one of my state representatives whine about how pulling down slaver statues is destroying art, well i guess we see why conservatives don’t get art, because they suck at it.

  • Rosco@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t know who this guy was and I’m not American, but I dissaprove of people vandalizing or destroying old statues. They should be removed from public view if they’re controversial, but they should be kept (if they have historical significance). Destruction of history, no matter how dark it was, is a crime in my eyes. Nobody would think about destroying concentration camps or the likes, even though they represent the most horrific part of our history. And besides, pretty much everyone born more than two centuries ago were assholes and bigots by today’s standard, it’s hard to judge when most of them probably did not know better. Again, not cautioning what this dude did, probably slavery and a great deal of killing I imagine.

    • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      Most confederate statues are cheap crap bulk built all over the place sometime after the civil war as a sort of long term propaganda. They aren’t historical, they are reputation management.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        You should add that the “sometime after” was also often sometime after WWII, so they are not very historical, look ugly and take space.

      • voxel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        like the lenin statues that used to be all over ukraine and other post-soviet countries.

        • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I actually don’t know anything about those. Were they put there while the soviet union still existed/built by the soviet union themselves, or were they put there later after by some fan of the soviet union? If the goal is to keep what is historical, regardless of political context, that would be the key distinction in my opinion.

          • voxel@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            soviet union (mass-produced and) placed them literally everywhere.
            there’s at least one lenin or stalin statue per major street, some countries are just starting removing them, but it’s a really long process due to sheer amount of them, regulations and stuff.
            the amount of these things is somewhat absurd

      • callouscomic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’d argue most statues are some form of propaganda that likely don’t tell whole stories.

    • Euphorazine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Just to add some context, the statue was on private land. The decision to pull it down was by the owner.

      • deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        And it was installed in the late 90s. That’s not history: it’s a gaudy, racist lawn ornament.