Adobe faces big fines from FTC over difficult subscription cancellation::Adobe could face hefty fines related to its overly difficult and costly subscription cancellation practices due to an ongoing Federal Trade Commission Probe.

  • set_secret@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    remember boys and girls it’s always morally responsible to pirate Adobe programs.

    • Chailles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Or better yet, just don’t use Adobe products. Staying in their ecosystem is how they end up getting money anyways if that’s what you know how to use.

      • EliasChao@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        They’re the de-facto option in most of the industries they have products for, if you decide not to use any of their products, you’re alienating yourself from your peers.

        • Chailles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          And they’ll keep being the de-facto option if you just keep accepting that they are. In the end, Adobe software and their alternatives are often similar enough that transitioning from one to the other isn’t difficult.

  • CentreForAnts@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    11 months ago

    We used to use frame.io which is now owned by Adobe. We had been with frame.io since the beginning so we were on one of their older business plans which they no longer offer to new customers, but throughout the years as we have been expanding we have purchased extra seats and storage when needed.

    Earlier this year they came to us and said they are getting rid of the business plan completely for all existing customers. So either we upgrade to their enterprise plan which will cost us about $12k per year more, a 300% price increase. And of the enterprise features we would gain from upgrading, we won’t even use in our current workflow. Or downgrade to their teams account which maxes out to 15 users only. We needed 22 for our current team so we physically couldn’t downgrade to that plan.

    Basically for the size of our business. We were too big for the teams account and not big enough to justify an enterprise account. There was no longer a plan to cater for business of our size.

    And we had about a month to make a decision. As our yearly plan was coming up for renewal.

    And the way the Adobe sales team approached this was terrible too. They kept emailing everyone on my team wanting to meet up and help ‘optimise’ frame.io into our workflow better. The way it was worded everyone thought it was a scam email at 1st. I eventually replied to see what they wanted as I’m the account manager and normally deal with frame.io for account renewals and what not, and straight away their call turned into a sales call telling us we needed to upgrade to enterprise.

    We went looking for an alternative as we knew we couldn’t use frame.io any more. And luckily came across krock.io which is a very similar video review platform which actually has some really nice features frame.io didn’t have. And priced at a reasonable price with unlimited users. So if anyone wants to get away from adobe/frame.io. I encourage you to try out krock.io and see if that fits your video review needs. They have a free trial to try it out. Hopefully more people can get away from adobe/frame.

  • hahattpro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is a fucking trap. Monthly subcription is a bait to force you into monthly but commit annuall subcription. And you got to pay the fine if you cancel.

    So, it is basicly lock in unaware user.

    I wonder what if a user use adobe for 13 months and cancel ? Do they have to pay the fine too ? Got to cancel the percision moment to avoid fine ?

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      I hate Adobe as much as anyone but they make it pretty damn clear that it’s a 12 month commitment and you obviously get a cheaper price for that.

      Of course they want to discourage people from committing to 12 months and then cancelling after 6 months. So you have to pay a fine of half of what you committed too.

      A normal rental company would be equally pissed if you promised that you were gonna pay them for 12 months and instead cancelled after 6.

      If people can’t be bothered to read what they are buying or any of the multiple warnings, then imo that’s their fault. It’s not like they bury this in their TOS or something, it’s prominent on and before the checkout page.

      • brianorca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s software. There’s literally no reason to treat it like a car lease. There is no overhead or cost on their part which justifies an early termination fee.

        • locuester@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          But this is the business model they chose, software usage leasing. I agree it sucks, but we can’t expect software leasing to be ruled illegal. Lol

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          No, but they offer a better price if you agree to a contract where you pay for a year.

          If you don’t want a better price then don’t go with an annual plan, easy.

          The cheaper annual plan wouldn’t exist if they didn’t have any way to stop people from abusing it.

          • Pandemanium@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            I started a free trial of Adobe stock. I forgot to cancel after the first month. They charged me $30 for the next month, ok, that’s on me. But when I tried to cancel during that second month, they said I had signed a contract to pay them for a year (I didn’t, all I did was sign up for the free trial) and I now owe them $165 to cancel the subscription. So in essence they were going to charge me $195 for one month of Adobe stock. That’s insane.

          • brianorca@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Every annual discount plan I know of (at other companies) is paid once per year. If you pay monthly, then you get the higher monthly price. If you stop paying, then your access stops. No extra fee to pay.

            • lud@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Adobe offers a prepaid annual plan, an annual plan paid monthly, and a normal monthly plan.

              They make that very clear from their order page.

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        If you get a $5/ month discount on a $30lmonth plan and decide to cancel after 6 months, you shouldn’t be fined $150 for the remaining 6 months.

        You should be fined $30 for the $5/month you saved on the 6 months you already used. They would try and charge you for the rest of the term instead while removing your ability to use the product for that time, making it pointless to cancel.

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          By my calculation it’s actually cheaper to go with the annual plan (creative cloud all apps) and cancel after 6 months and pay the fine than it is to just go with the monthly plan. (The discount is 30 USD per month)

          So I consider that to be reasonable.

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        They’re in thouble because they made it too complicated.

        If they said no refunds, or made every option 50% refund, the FTC wouldn’t be up in their grill.

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It seems that they don’t mind the fee it’s the cancellation process that they take issue with. It has been a while since I last used Adobe products but I can’t recall that it was so bad. But maybe it’s still not legal.

          They are probably entirely within their rights to offer no refunds but I suspect that would anger people even more.

          50% refunds on the normal monthly wouldn’t make sense, because the plan doesn’t cancel until the end of the month anyways. So they would offer 50% refunds for essentially nothing.

  • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    11 months ago

    I long for the day when people who think about doing this kind of shit worry about jail time, not just slap on the wrist fines.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      At a minimum they should have their business license suspended for a period of time.

      Let’s see how many customers a business gets when there’s the risk that said business gets shut down for a month.

      With the requirement that all staff below management still get paid regular salary.

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      They’ll keep doing it until we start taking the problem of monopolies seriously

  • ĐƗǤƗŦΔŁ Ǥ€ΜƗŇƗ@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    11 months ago

    Not surprised. I have been using Affinity Photo, Designer and Publisher for 5 years and don’t miss Adobe at all. People should check them out if they haven’t found their own good alternatives already.

  • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    11 months ago

    I was an Adobe customer years ago, but due to things like the above, they inadvertently pushed me to Open Source alternatives and I have not looked back. So I guess, Thank You Adobe is in order. Hope the fine is actually big as they really played dirty.

    • joker125@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      Same here.

      I remember suggesting alternatives like GIMP to photography pros years ago simply because I could see where Adobe was heading when they changed to the subscription model.

      Don’t get me wrong, they were innovative a long time ago however now they are structured purely on greed and add nothing deserved my of their services nowadays.

      • Akuchimoya@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Gimp, Inkscape, and Scribus were terrible to use after using Adobe for years. Get Affinity suite instead and save yourself the rage and frustration. It’s one-time payment license (not a subscription) and they have deals. I got the license for the three of them for $90. They are way closer to Adobe products and definitely worth the one-time cost.

        I love the concept of open source, but you can only make so many compromises in quality and usability, especially if you’re likelihood depends on it. Gimp, etc just aren’t there.

        (On the other end of the spectrum, Blender is so amazing I can still hardly believe it.)

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I love the concept of open source, but you can only make so many compromises in quality and usability

          I think this is a false dichotomy. You contradict yourself in the next sentence with an example that FOSS isn’t necessarily inferior.

          • Akuchimoya@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            You need to check your reading comprehension. I never said there’s any such dichotomy about FOSS as a general concept. I specifically named Gimp, Inkscape, and Scribus before and after that sentence. Just because a FOSS “alternative” exists, doesn’t mean it actually is an alternative, or at least an acceptable one. Each software has to be evaluated individually. In the case of Gimp, Inkscape, and Scribus, they would not be acceptable in a professional creative space.

          • fossilesque@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Blender enters the chat.

            FOSS is a slow moving boulder. Eventually it catches us and consumes competition if it can keep momentum.

      • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Agreed. Plus if you know Photoshop, you know GIMP as they are very similar and GIMP can even open Photoshop files. I use GIMP and Blender 3D daily.

  • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    This why we have regulations and why we NEED it

    This is exactly why you have corporate politicians screaming about “government oversight” and they’re adamant about taking away all the corporate teeth from the FEC, FTC, CFPB

    So their donors can get away with shit like this

  • realitista@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    11 months ago

    I always try to buy subscriptions with PayPal for this reason. Because buried in their UI you can go turn off the automatic payments to that payee. They usually cancel the subscription themselves if you stop paying them.

    • ogginger43@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      Privacy.com is what I use. It lets you generate virtual cards to use so you don’t need to hand over your actual debit card. You can also set a maximum per day/month/transaction.

      • locuester@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Capital One does this with a browser extension. It’s great. I can use a temp card for a one month sub, and then just delete the card.

  • db2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 months ago

    Fractions of pennies compared to what they’re taking in. This isn’t a fine, it’s racketeering.

  • mrfriki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Sadly the fine won’t be greater than the benefits this practice brings to Adobe so they’ll keep doing it.