• Spaceman Spiff@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thing is, the slow boil technique is tried and true. Each turn of the crank would only anger a small group, and would ensure the platform remains stable and popular.

    A better question is why is this happening all at once? It feels like the top brass had a meeting to discuss options to increase revenue, and just decided “Fuck it. Let’s just do them all”

    • norb@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My feeling is they looked at their user numbers, and the specifically those using the API and/or 3rd party apps, and did the calculation to decide that they wouldn’t lose enough people to cause a mass migration.

      I think whether that calculation was correct or not still remains to be seen.

      • Gradually_Adjusting
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        A distant cause is likely the changes in monetary policy (rate hikes). The tech sector has been structuring their capital as if borrowing would always be cheap, and they were unprepared for a sudden flight toward sustainable cash flow.

        I think their only hope for “fuck you money” at this point is to cash out at IPO and watch it burn.

        • Boz (he/him)@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The thing about borrowing is an interesting idea. This is the first time I’ve seen it mentioned, but now I’m going to look into it.

    • underisk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      My guess is their funding dried up due to recent financial system instability causing venture capitalists to stop blindly handing out money. That plus the NFT shit they were into suggests they might have had some exposure to the recent crypto fallout as well. The upcoming IPO and the way spez seems determined to see this through no matter what screams looming financial crisis.

    • ungoogleable@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think it makes a lot of sense as a series of emotional reactions, mostly from spez. He won’t back down and no one can make him.

      They don’t want to serve ads through the API because ad buyers care about exactly how the ads will be presented. The apps would have to work very closely with Reddit to ensure consistent ad presentation, which is more work for them so they don’t want to do it.

      The API price was plucked out of thin air, presumably based on what they believed OpenAI/Microsoft/Google would be willing to pay. Third party apps were acceptable collateral damage.

    • manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      because the commons is not sustainable as a profit entity, never was. The move to 5%+ rates is pushing every player to “make it” or “die”

      reddit is toast.