Currently I’m reading Nina Burton’s ‘Livets tunna väggar’ which translate to something like Walls of Life. It’s a book by a Swedish writer who inherits her mother’s summer house. When she wants to renovate it, she finds all sort of life around and in the house. She uses said life to teach you something about the intellect of various insects and animals, which goes deeper than humans normally think.

It’s a very interesting book that makes me think about non-human life even more. Creatures that are thousands of times smaller than we are have such complex societal structures. Humans have overcommodified animal life for centuries now, seeing them as property and commodities instead of complex and intelligent life forms.

What are you reading?

  • Jusog@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Damn bro… So many ppl are reading several books at once apparently. I don’t think my brain could manage so much information at once honestly o.O

    I’m reading “Blackshirts and Reds” by Parenti. Am on page 119 rn, and I gotta say I still enjoy Parenti’s simpler style of writing as opposed to Marx’. Also I was surprised how Parenti went into detail abt czechoslovakia even. Specifically abt Vaclav Havél’s privatization campaign. Never thought he’d go that direction. I feel like I learned a LOT through this book and I’ll keep recommending it to everyone who hasn’t read it. I think anyone can profit from reading this.

    After I’m done with this book, I thought I might pick up Mao’s “On Practice”? I read “Dialectical and Historical Materialism” by Stalin and “How to be a Good Communist” by Liu Shaoqi, so I hope that book might additionally help me understand philosophy more.

      • Jusog@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, true. I only read Lenin’s “Three Sources and Three Component Parts of Marxism” as of yet. Do you have any specific book recommendations from him?

        • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Imperialism, highest stage of capitalism.

          State and revolution.

          These are his most important writings imo. They are also incredibly easy to consume.

        • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          State and Revolution is essential for understanding the state and why Anarchists and Socdems are wrong. Imperialism is a good foundation for understanding today’s globalized capitalism. I gotta read Left Wing Communism sometime. I gotta go back and read his writing on dialectics, but I’ve covered my bases with other dialectics works (on contradiction is a total banger). What Is to Be Done is kind of overrated and very specific to Russia’s conditions at the time, though it may be useful to a well read strategist. That’s all I know about Lenin’s works.

          • cucumovirus@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I would say that What Is To Be Done? is one of Lenin’s most important works, if anything I’d say it’s underrated. Like (mostly) all of his works, it talks directly about the situation in Russia at the time, but that doesn’t make it any less useful. You just have to extract the universal principles from the tactical particularity he’s writing about.

            WITBD? focuses on the need for organizing, and not just any kind, but actual revolutionary organizing with both theory and practice, for bringing together the proletariat with all other revolutionary classes and even individual intellectuals. It speaks against just focusing on a binary interpretation of class struggle (proletariat vs bourgeoisie), and instead it tells us to focus on any struggle that is revolutionary (anti-colonial struggles, gender liberation struggles, etc.).

            Here’s how Losurdo describes it in Class Struggle:

            • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I know, it’s important, it’s just boring, and more for advanced and organizing people. Without reading I already understand the distinction between tailing the masses and being a vanguard. It’s an important idea, it’s just a lot of reading for a simple conclusion dressed in time specific evidence.

              Edit: by overrated I mean by larpers.

    • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      So many ppl are reading several books at once apparently. I don’t think my brain could manage so much information at once honestly o.O

      I hardly have the attention span to only read one or two. I’m usually reading more. I like to have a break between different chapters of a book in reading something else. It helps me hold the information from each passage rather than blending a whole book together in my mind. It (most of the time) prevents me from getting bored in the middle of books.

      • Jusog@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a rly interesting perspective. I too feel like I can’t remember important stuff from the books I read cuz the information mushes together in the end, but I never thought abt reading another book to counter that.

        Imma try that and see if it works lol

    • ghostOfRoux();@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you are gonna do Mao, I’d say grab Five Essays. It’s got On Contradiction and On Practice both, which are always recommended for good reason, but it also has a few other really good works by him.

      I’m trying to find it as an epud to add to my collection but I listened to the audiobook version which is on Spotify.

    • Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      On practice isn’t really a communist theory book, it’s more like a book about management.

      Nonetheless it’s still a good read.

        • Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guess you can look at it that way, but this is the kind of stuff you do in management as well.

          • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t know anything about management so maybe you’re right, but from the first paragraph it’s pretty clear what the essay is about.

            Before Marx, materialism examined the problem of knowledge apart from the social nature of man and apart from his historical development, and was therefore incapable of understanding the depen- dence of knowledge on social practice, that is, the dependence of knowledge on production and the class struggle.