• Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would being better pay, better benefits, even more stable careers and better work-life balance.

      It doesn’t matter how much money you’re already making, or how good your benefits already are. If you have a Union, you can negotiate for improvements. There is always room for improvement, unless you’re working at a fully-mutual workers cooperative.

      I know first hand that some trades even make more than their unionized counterparts

      I’d be interested to learn more, do you have a source or anything?

      • Moonguide@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        This, plus, relying on the goodwill of someone who benefits from you earning as little as possible is a terrible idea.

        • off_brand_@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          This does suck though. To start, a counter-offer-based model begs discrimination. You should be getting yearly raises commensurate with (at absolute bare minimum, not even necessarily accounting for inflation) the increase in productivity from year to year.

          This is to say nothing of work environments. Unions could reduce or end crunch. Not just as hard blockers, but mandating the kind of project management that doesn’t require crunch.

          There’s also a history of wage suppression.

          https://www.inc.com/jeremy-quittner/silicon-valley-wage-collusion-class-action.html

          They’ll only get better at it, especially as the market continues to turn and companies continue to consolidate.

          • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            This does suck though. To start, a counter-offer-based model begs discrimination. You should be getting yearly raises commensurate with (at absolute bare minimum, not even necessarily accounting for inflation) the increase in productivity from year to year.

            I see that a lot with just the starting percentages of yearly raises. Most companies never keep up with market value, and by the time you’ve spent ten years there, you’re making much lower than the industry standard.

            The worst is employers who have some 1-5 scale for yearly performance and they gatekeep bosses who try to give out too many 5s. It’s not a competition among your peers. If the whole team is doing good and working hard, then reward all of them.

            • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It’s not that you don’t have individual bargaining power. It’s just that if you were unionised, you’d have much more.

              The extent to which you are arguing against overwhelming evidence cannot be understated. You are arguing against something less controversial than evolution.

              We know that unions promote economic equality and build worker power, helping workers to win increases in pay, better benefits, and safer working conditions.

              But that’s not all unions do. Unions also have powerful effects on workers’ lives outside of work.

              High unionization levels are associated with positive outcomes across multiple indicators of economic, personal, and democratic well-being

              Unions raise wages of unionized workers by roughly 20% and raise compensation, including both wages and benefits, by about 28%.

              Unionized workers are more likely to receive paid leave, have health insurance and pension plans.

              Unionized workers receive more generous health benefits than nonunionized workers.

              Unionized workers receive 26% more vacation time and 14% more total paid leave

              How unions help all workers

              Workers get significant economic benefits from labor unions

              Unionized workers earn 10.2% more than their non-union peers

              Supporting workers’ right to organize is a key way to help boost wages and support quality jobs.

              Unions provide major economic benefits for workers and families

                • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  How is it hand wavy?!

                  Imagine you are an employer with 100 employees, presented with the following situations.

                  1. One employee demands a pay raise of 50%, or he’ll leave.
                  2. 80 employees, including the employee above, demand a pay raise of 50% or they’ll all leave.

                  In which of these two situations are you more likely to be willing to grant that 50% raise?

        • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Every couple years I interview around, I get a job offer, I take it back it my employer and they either match it or I leave.

          I don’t even have to do that. My employer always give me good raises and even better bonuses. Every year.

          Benefits are great. PTO is great. Work-life balance is great. No layoffs whatsoever. It’s not just about making money for the company and the owners, but the rest of the employees as well.

          I don’t need the strife from trying to start a union here. Save it for companies that have pushed their employees too far. Unionize where it’s going to have the greatest benefit.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ever talked to the cleaning staff how they’re faring? Your suppliers in Cambodia (or wherever)?

            It’s not that hard for capital to see reason when it comes to specialised, educated, and sometimes right out irreplaceable workers, but that doesn’t mean that capital suddenly developed a conscience.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You know perfectly well what I meant and the intent and purpose behind my comment. Try again.

                And even if you’re working in a five person co-op outfit and someone of you indeed does scrub the toilet: What about the dishwashers at that Chinese takeout you order at every other day. How does your actual supply chain look like, even if it’s pizza and coffee.

        • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I definitely reject that my compensation, benefits, job stability, and WLB would be better if I had been unionized this whole time.

          Why? What is your reasoning for rejecting this? Can you justify it? You’re just saying “no” without any thought or explanation. Do you just refuse to believe that things could be better?

            • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I read your whole comment, but at no point does it explain why you think you wouldn’t be able to negotiate improvements with a union. What you have written essentially amounts to:

              “I was able to build a really beautiful cabinet with hand tools. I reject the notion that power tools make it easier to build cabinets. I know people who have power tools but they haven’t made cabinets as nice as mine.”

              If you have multiple people as a group who have the power to completely sink a business negotiating together, they stand a much better chance of improving conditions than any of them do alone.

              How are you reasoning against such a self-evidently true claim?

                • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m in the same field as you are with years more experience. Not only that, I have experience in management in the same field.

                  I am not denying that you have individual bargaining power that I’m sure you’re leveraging successfully.

                  I am just pointing out to you that if you were unionised, you’d have even more bargaining power which would almost definitely have resulted in a better outcome for you.

                  Collective bargaining may not be risk free, but it’s lower risk than individual bargaining, by definition.

                  There’s plenty of proof, and I don’t see why I need any more. You’re just refusing to acknowledge it, like a flat earther faced with the results of their experiment refusing to accept it. Just because you say “no, I don’t like this scientific proof” it doesn’t mean that I’m somehow failing to back up my argument when I refuse to give you more proof. You have THE proof of the matter. Accept it and be right, or reject it and be wrong. It’s up to you.

                  As for your analogy, being in a union does not mean you lose your individual bargaining rights, you can continue to negotiate your salary individually if you wish to do so. You do not lose any power or rights from being in a union. You only gain power.

        • ampersandrew@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not in games, but if/when things start to turn, it’s far easier for myself and the people around me to just leave for an employer that treats us right than to try to unionize and force the current one to behave. Those are the benefits of having a job that’s very much in demand though, not to mention one that can be worked from home and isn’t dependent on geography, so the union isn’t necessary because the employees already hold enough power. If the employer has a monopoly on your jobs, being able to unionize is a powerful tool in your toolbelt.

          • reinar@distress.digital
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            the funny thing is actual ability to pay is varying from business to business. AAA development with in-house engine is simply inferior as a business compared to mobile gamedev or producing shitty battle royale clones with Unity. If some business can’t compete with big tech or low-effort money grabbers, does it mean it has to go?

            • ampersandrew@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, for the same reason that fine dining restaurants don’t go out of business when there’s a McDonald’s around the corner. They’re different markets.