• WldFyre@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 days ago

    The two-state solution is a boondoggle.

    Better tell that to China, or do you know better than an AES state?

      • WldFyre@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        I think it’s one of those weasel words some leftists use so they can ignore their own hypocrisy while they moralize like the evangelical Christians they were raised as.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          So you don’t know what it means.

          Critical support means supporting AES countries against the capitalist hegemon despite still having criticisms of some of their decisions. I don’t have to think every single decision they make is perfect because I don’t moralize about my politics.

          What you’re talking about is dogmatism, i.e. taking uncritical moral positions and then denouncing any deviation. Mao harshly criticized this in On Contradiction and On Practice.

          • WldFyre@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 days ago

            No decision can ever be perfect, is my point.

            taking uncritical moral positions and then denouncing any deviation

            Lol I’ve been to Hexbear and old chapo chat, I have no idea how you can say this with a straight face.

            Mao harshly criticized this in On Contradiction and On Practice.

            Cool, was that before or after struggle sessions were implemented in China?

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              Okay, that’s about following the Party line and the strategy of democratic centralism. What the Party decides is what the membership must respect and uphold.

              I am not a member of the Communist Party of China. They wouldn’t want me anyway lol

              • WldFyre@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                17 days ago

                i.e. taking uncritical moral positions and then denouncing any deviation

                What the Party decides is what the membership must respect and uphold.

                Hmmm

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  17 days ago

                  It’s strategic, not moral. The Communist Party of China has 99 million members. Without democratic centralism it would just be a big club of communism fans, not a Party.

                  Once there’s an agreed upon decision, every Party member must uphold it for the strategic advancement of the Party agenda.

                  • WldFyre@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    17 days ago

                    You honestly think citizens should be publicly punished and shamed for purely strategic reasons? I somehow don’t believe that.

                    every Party member must uphold it

                    Sounds like a moral imperative to me tbh

                    But honestly this is just more examples of trying to weasel out of hypocritical positions like evangelical Christians do. Change some words around and act like it’s a different thing even though the real world effect is the same, which is funny for a group that claims to deal in material conditions.

                    “I don’t HATE you, I just think you deserve to go to Hell.”

                    “We don’t denounce deviation because deviating is immoral, we denounce it because it would be bad game theory not to.”