• bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    So you want a local conscript or volunteer militia? How about those local groups making alliances, sharing training, building up shared resources and infrastructure, a unified command, standardized equipment for better and more efficient defense?

    • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      So long as the local group autonomy is still respected that can work fine in theory. Once you start stripping groups of autonomy to make a beauracratic monster, you’ve lost the anarchism plot. A lot harder in practice to have a massive armed org that values that autonomy. Most of the time local groups will be linked to other groups. Just by group consensus, not by necessity because of course that too would not be anarchism.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Well, yeah. Anarchism loses wars to bureaucracy. That was settled in 50 BC with the Gallic Wars.

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          Im no historian but I think we’ve made some headway in technology that allows for quicker longer distance organization in the past 2000 years.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            That gives even greater advantage to centralized bureaucracy. 2000 years ago armies could be independent weeks before anyone back in Rome knew what happened.

      • SolacefromSilence@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        Sounds like a theoretical Libertarian trying to raise an army. Do you hand a copy of the NAP to just the volunteers or also to those you fight?

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          If you cant tell anarchism from libertarianism, theres no intelectual basis to continue this conversation on. Which would explain why you set up a strawman with your second sentence.

          • SolacefromSilence@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            You got me, it seems I have not educated myself thoroughly enough.

            Really though, if only the enlightened can see the light then it seems like it’s just an academic exercise or trolling people to advocate for ineffectual fringe theory.

            You may be right, but also powerless.