• newfie@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    What was McCains stance on all of the above?

    Pining for the party of Bush is pining for evil and diminished living standards

    • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      None of that has anything to do with Kamala Harris. Again, what the hell are you talking about? That paragraph is addressing CONSERVATIVES.

      • newfie@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        You’re saying Kamala will help restore the GOP to the party of Bush and McCain. That is a terrible thing to admit. The neoconservatives are monsters who harmed the country, to say nothing of the innocents abroad who were tortured and murdered

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          Where the eff is this BS from? They clearly said if you cut off the toxic poisoned head spewing hate and venom, the Republican Party can rebuild around ideas, policy, maybe even around morality (doubt). If you’re a conservative, that ought to be a good thing. If you’re pro-democracy, the renewal of two sane choices battling for ideas ought to be a good thing.

          I’m sure I also would disagree with those ideas, but I welcome the competition, I welcome the possibility of respecting g our national leaders.

          All I can say is that when Mitt Romney talks family values, he means actual family values. When Ronald Reagan said he’d trickle down on you, you could smell the urine. When Ross Perot talked about corporatism, he meant it