• Cryophilia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you remove the entire aspect of private vehicles in Metro areas, you free l suddenly free up a lot of space and increase efficiency for the other modes of transport.

    But we don’t HAVE those other means of transport, not nearly at the level to replace cars and not even at all in some places.

    Your equation is basically “remove cars, replace with transit” but you’re totally hand waving away the second part.

    All the government subsidies to benefit EVs are a drop in the bucket compared to the cost of retooling infrastructure to support public transit. It needs to be done, but it can’t be done quickly without a massive, exponential increase in funding, and EVs won’t cover that gap.

    Being anti-EV is being against one of the most useful, efficient, and effective ways of lowering ghg emissions we have.

    Your idea of “ripping the bandaid off” leaves millions of people stranded while they wait for transit to be built.

    We can do both and must do both. EVs for now, transit for future.