SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agoNo further questions your honourlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up1313arrow-down10
arrow-up1313arrow-down1imageNo further questions your honourlemmy.dbzer0.comSnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square20fedilink
minus-squarebran_buckler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up25·1 month agoWhy is the changing her life part (losing weight and getting a divorce after seeing Bigfoot) relevant? Did she leave her husband to try to get with Bigfoot and is suing the state because they claim her new beau doesn’t exist? Wild!
minus-squarelieuwex@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up24·edit-21 month agoShe says that seeing bigfoot was so inspiring that she lost weight and got a divorce. Not kidding. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5512979/Woman-saw-bigfoot-SUING-California.html It does not seem relevant to the argumentation in the lawsuit.
minus-squareWolfLink@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoHow come even in 2024 with 4k HDR 120FPS video cameras on smartphones in everyone’s pockets, the alleged videos of Bigfoot are still complete mush? I don’t even see a bear in that video. It’s not clear there’s anything besides trees. It’s just a big dark blob.
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·1 month agoProbably because she thought that the impossible was possible and took action based on that change in perception. Dating bigfoot being the impossible thing.
minus-squarePapaStevesy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 month agoBut why would that lead her to sue the park for saying it was a bear? Seems unrelated.
minus-squareGregorGizeh@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 month agoProbably because they killed her changed mindset with it and now she is worried of falling back into old habits
minus-squareEleventhHour@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoHurt fee-fees “How dare you break my delusion!”
minus-squarebulwark@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoNot that uncommon. Have you seen that documentary called The Man Who Killed Hitler and Then the Bigfoot
minus-squareGork@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 month agoLikely an editorial error and got their stories mixed up. But I like your scenario.
Why is the changing her life part (losing weight and getting a divorce after seeing Bigfoot) relevant? Did she leave her husband to try to get with Bigfoot and is suing the state because they claim her new beau doesn’t exist? Wild!
She says that seeing bigfoot was so inspiring that she lost weight and got a divorce. Not kidding. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5512979/Woman-saw-bigfoot-SUING-California.html
It does not seem relevant to the argumentation in the lawsuit.
How come even in 2024 with 4k HDR 120FPS video cameras on smartphones in everyone’s pockets, the alleged videos of Bigfoot are still complete mush?
I don’t even see a bear in that video. It’s not clear there’s anything besides trees. It’s just a big dark blob.
Probably because she thought that the impossible was possible and took action based on that change in perception.
Dating bigfoot being the impossible thing.
But why would that lead her to sue the park for saying it was a bear? Seems unrelated.
Probably because they killed her changed mindset with it and now she is worried of falling back into old habits
Hurt fee-fees
“How dare you break my delusion!”
Not that uncommon. Have you seen that documentary called The Man Who Killed Hitler and Then the Bigfoot
Likely an editorial error and got their stories mixed up. But I like your scenario.