10-year-old Fatima Jaafar Abdullah was killed in pager explosions in Lebanon.

Israel murders another kid again.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Reported as a biased source and MBFC backs that up… when talking about Turkish issues, they are very pro government.

    As this doesn’t readily involve the Turkish government, I’ll allow it.

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      “MBFC” is basically a single dude’s opinion, containing a shitton of bias. Using it to verify credibility of anything is wrong.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        If you have a better solution involving an API we can use for free, I’m open.

        I see no issue with the MBFC assessment on this source.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          LOL this is the hilarious response of
          “Oh yeah?! Don’t have anything better than putting a biased source of credibility attached to every article for no reason other than for people to use to dismiss articles and not read them?!
          Well too bad removing it isn’t an option! Find me a different one cause it makes me feel good!”
          said the minority.

            • Krauerking@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              28 days ago

              The only idea you will accept is yours, literally has to be there cause of no particular reason other than personal desires and wants.

              Its like saying the only option is punching or kicking children cause you won’t accept the answer of “stop abusing them!”

              Maybe just back off and listen? Or at this point I am forced to assume the mods are being paid for including something that has not been positively talked about once. And they are just taking payment.

              • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                28 days ago

                Oh, no, we’re fully accepting of other ideas. We even had a meeting with another fact checking company who wanted to charge us 6 figures for API access, so that’s a non-starter.

                The basics are really simple - You think MBFC is biased? Cite an example and name someone better.

                We’re waiting…

                • Krauerking@lemy.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  28 days ago

                  You aren’t accepting of other ideas you just want someone to tell you what they are apparently. These “fact checkers” are for making a profit or paying themselves and mostly exist to make you feel good about being picky with what information you ignore in a world where there mostly isn’t good options for any number of reasons depending who you agree with.

                  You can’t seen to get the idea that we don’t view it as necessary and visual clutter. And the option we are aiming for isn’t a replacement that you seen to be stuck on because, see above.

                  https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/the-presence-of-unexpected-biases-in-online-fact-checking/

                  People aren’t likely to change their stance either it just reconfirms set feelings for the most part unless it is a lie at which point it should already be removed right?

                  So this is at best a badge for pretending civility. It’s pointless.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      I don’t understand what you’re trying to say. Is it OK for a nation state to plant bombs in suspected opponents and then explode them at random without respect for collateral damage? If Russians did the same to Americans, you’d be all “fair play, mate”?

      • CoCo_Goldstein@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        If there were an anti-Russian militia that set up shop in America and occasionally attacked Russia and Russia figured out a way to target many members of this militia and a few innocent bystanders were also injured or killed, the rest of the world would say “yeah… that is what you get” and Americans would say “Why are we allowing these armed assholes to set up shop in America and attack Russia?”

        • PiousAgnostic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          Lol, if there was an anti-anybody militia that sometimes acted against other states within the US. The US would raid their complex, set it on fire, and shoot people trying to escape.

          Then, the government would blame the children and other non-combatants’ deaths on the militia. The public then will watch documentaries made on the subject over dinner.

          Pager bombs aimed at extremists are not an American concern. Even if there was a level of non-combatant causilities. If anything, it’s a fun news blip of the week and will be forgotten in less than a month.

          • CoCo_Goldstein@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            25 days ago

            Thanks Broseph. I totally agree with your response. I was doing my best to provide a proper analogy to db0’s question: “If Russians did the same to Americans, you’d be all “fair play, mate”?”

  • ravhall@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I get going after your ‘enemy,’ but this is even worse than firing randomly into a crowd of Palestinians. They pushed a button not knowing who would die. This is low, even for them.

    I can’t even think of a devil’s advocate argument for this.

    • leisesprecher@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not that I think the Israel is the good guy in this conflict, but your argument is pretty weak.

      Pager are designed to be trackable. If you have such deep access to these devices, you know exactly who got called by whom and when.

      Yes, there will be collateral damage, but that’s almost a given in any armed conflict.

      • febra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        So which armed conflict in the middle of Beirut are you talking about now?

    • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I believe the devil’s advocate argument would be that, based on Hezbollah’s internal communications, the Mossad intercepted a shipment of pagers which were being purchased to replace their (potentially compromised) mobile phones, knowing that these were - in theory - being distributed exclusively to Hezbollah operatives. That would make it the most precise military strike of all time.

      Everyone who launches a rocket is accepting the possibility of “collateral damage”, but this is surely the most surgical of surgical strikes in history. And yet, yes, they must have accepted the risk of bystander casualties, which just serves to highlight how awful that logic is. It’s definitely not worse than randomly firing into a crowd, though.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      It is a huge technical operation to intercept an order and replace it with modified devices without the target knowing. Particularly when the target has to be extra careful in ordering things in the first place to avoid sanctions.

      In contrast sending out an “execute order 66” message is pretty trivial to trigger them

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          30 days ago

          Not a ton is known, by from what I understand the explosives were part of a secondary board added to the pagers, which would also have the ability to listen for a separate signal or look for a specific one the pager received.

  • febra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    If iPhones had explosives planted in them straight out of the factory and would’ve went off in New York all at the same time, injuring thousands and endangering people around them, the 24/7 news cycle would’ve already called for total annihilation and what not.