• rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    No, advertising is not necessary when a user can search a catalogue with multiple optional constraints, as we did in the olden days of printed catalogues.

    Advertising is harmful - it’s somebody trying to persuade you that you need to buy a thing. First, you’ll usually know when you need something. Second, the salesman is not someone you’d believe normally.

    It’s an interaction which normally should be initiated by you, not by sellers. Which makes advertising utterly useless immediately.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’d argue the catalog could be seen as advertising though.

      “This is what you can buy from us” and the language in those catalogs presents everything in the best possible light.

      Catalogs were almost always free, because it marketed products to consumers… Aka advertising.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago
        1. You’d open one only when you wanted it.

        2. A database with various characteristics being the main component and the advertising text not being that is better, yes.

        • nyan@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          To put it another way, the difference is push vs. pull. A catalogue is a pull offering: the person looking at it is doing so by choice, because they’re interested in what it offers and want to buy something (or at least window shop). An online ad is a push offering: it’s presented to people who did not choose to see it, are not interested in it, and just wish it would go away and let them get on with what they’re actually trying to do. Pull advertising is (usually) acceptable. Push advertising is not.