• snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    It was fine when the limited duration was a reasonable number of years. Anything over 30 years max before being in the public domain is too long.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      That was fine then, but it makes zero sense today.

      If a book is on sale widely to the public, and it costs nothing to copy and distribute that book to everyone, why shouldn’t we?

      The fundamental problem with copyright is it is a system that rewards creators by imposing artificial scarcity where there is no need for one. Capitalism is a system designed around things having value when they’re scarce, but information in a world of computers and the internet is inherently unscarce the instant it’s digitized. Copyright just means that we build all these giant DRM systems to impose scarcity on something that doesn’t need it so that we can still get creators paid a living.

      But a better system would for paying creators would be one of attribution and reward, where everyone can read whatever they want or stream whatever they want, and artists would be paid based on their number of views.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        But a better system would for paying creators would be one of attribution and reward, where everyone can read whatever they want or stream whatever they want, and artists would be paid based on their number of views.

        Which would be enforced through copyright…