Per the rules, this is the original headline. However, the interesting part is that he’s preparing a Gaza offer that he says will be “final”.

They’ve hewn very close to the whole “unconditional support” thing, so I’m curious what that means exactly.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Hmmm, let’s see, Netanyahu has been non-stop bombing Gaza since… last October.

    It’s almost October again. It’s nearly been a full year since the actual initial attack.

    There was never a justification to still be bombing nearly a year later after one attack.

    It’s clear Netanyahu has no intention to stop.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Man, I really wish I could have changed the headline. I’m going to get mostly comments like this, I think.

      No hate, there’s only so much time in a day to read Lemmy.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not your fault that all titles are now effectively clickbait. Thanks for putting the important info in the body of your post.

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      “after one attack” now that is thinking outside the box. I wonder why they build the iron dome.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I wonder why they attack?

        It’s a natural right of all peoples to fight back against invaders and genociders.

  • fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    He added that the US would not give up, and would “push as hard as we can” for a deal.

    If denying future arms shipments isn’t on the table then this statement is a lie

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hopefully, this means that Bibi repeatedly humiliating the US finally broke through the fucking insane inflexible support the US has had for Israel the past 40 years.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’d think.

      But Biden is still gargling those balls; and still hasn’t stopped weapons shipments.

      Guess 4.2 million . Is a lot of loyalty.

  • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If only Biden had some kind of leverage he could use on Bibi like putting conditions on arms exports oh wait he completely refuses to do that so this is just bs rhetoric

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, I’m not sure what the plan is if they turn down the “final” offer. The last time the US bluffed, that I know of, was the red line in Syria, and that involved a place Americans don’t care about, and would have involved another American war in the Middle East to respond to.

      I find “China’s final warning” and actual consequences for Israel equally unlikely. Is there a third option?

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, I’m not sure what the plan is if they turn down the “final” offer.

        You’re not? The plan is to enable genocide no matter what.

      • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        He won’t because he’s a Zionist. Biden will literally spend the rest of his presidency helping Netanyahu help trump get elected

        • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Biden has bypassed Congress multiple times to send more arms to Israel his actions make it clear how he feels about this his words mean nothing

  • Sunforged@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    “You’re not doing enough, so here’s another 10 billion in arms funding. You have to spend that in America though because I am very upset with you Bibi.”

  • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’m honestly seeing parallels to how Milosevic had a limit for how long he could delay a cease fire

  • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Biden probably means that Netanyahu hasn’t murdered enough children, and will follow up by sending more weapons.

  • NeuronautML@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh it’s final this time. 5 more years of this and Israel will see their supply drying up, you know, maybe, possibly.

    Oh, oh, now you done it, that’s another 10000 children. You’re very very close to the limit, mister. You better watch out or, you’ll get slighly less aid next time! We’re not kidding this time.

  • Zombie-Mantis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Lmao I read that as “Biden not doing enough to secure Gaza hostage deal, says Biden,” and got real confused.