TehBamski@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 5 months agoWhat Film Are You Surprised Didn't Get A Sequel?message-squaremessage-square212fedilinkarrow-up1105arrow-down14
arrow-up1101arrow-down1message-squareWhat Film Are You Surprised Didn't Get A Sequel?TehBamski@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square212fedilink
minus-squareTracked@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·5 months agoWhat’s up with denying the trilogy? The shitty PC era movie I get it. But the sequels were excellent, the symbolism and how smith is defeated it’s brilliant. I bet you wanted a copy of the first movie.
minus-squarelugal@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoYou call it a trilogy because you reject the fourth one I call it trilogy because I reject the first one We are not the same Jokes aside, I would call 2&3 a long movie, which makes it a trilogy again. One mistake is to see them as separate
What’s up with denying the trilogy? The shitty PC era movie I get it. But the sequels were excellent, the symbolism and how smith is defeated it’s brilliant. I bet you wanted a copy of the first movie.
You call it a trilogy because you reject the fourth one
I call it trilogy because I reject the first one
We are not the same
Jokes aside, I would call 2&3 a long movie, which makes it a trilogy again. One mistake is to see them as separate