• lunarul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    My mother-in-law was in the US visiting us when she got appendicitis. Took her to the doctor and had to get surgery the same day, her appendix was close to bursting and we were told she wouldn’t have made it another day. My wife overheard the nurse yelling at the doctor for accepting a patient with no insurance. So apparently even in life and death situations, sending you back is an option if you don’t have insurance.

    • NABDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I work at a hospital. I have heard that another hospital in our city will transfer patients to our hospital because, we are “better at treating their particular condition”, that condition being “poor”

    • Sprokes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I watched a documentary about the situation of health care in the US and I think it was Texas’s gouvernement who was saying that hospitals are required to give you the health care needed in the case of an emergency.

      • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        This is broadly true, though there can be some wiggle room in the exact definitely of “immediate life-saving care” depending on where you end up. In particular, a condition like appendicitis that will inevitably lead to a crisis may be turned away until it actually becomes one, even if that makes things riskier and costlier for everyone involved.