The most striking proposals were for the elimination of medical debt for millions of Americans; the “first-ever” ban on price gouging for groceries and food; a cap on prescription drug costs; a $25,000 subsidy for first-time home buyers; and a child tax credit that would provide $6,000 per child to families for the first year of a baby’s life.

  • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    $6,000 credit for newborns

    So, you mean, born with debt? (On top of whatever public debt per capita is)

    • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      No. It’s basically a continuation of the child tax credit that the republicans killed. It lifted half of kids out of poverty that were in poverty and it was a very very popular covid relief program.

      • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        very very popular covid relief program

        I mean, everyone’s happy when money is flowing in. But someone has to pay for this.

        Also: 6k is pretty much nothing compared to the long term cost of raising the child. It really is a populist move - she’s buying votes with taxpayer money

        • Mathazzar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes, you see… i want the taxes I pay to go to helping people. We could instead, say, stop giving as much to the DoD. We could raise taxes on corporations and close off shore loopholes… you know, basic good governance.

          • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            i want the taxes I pay to go to helping people

            I generally agree with this, but I’d rather see government spending my money on infrastructure, like roads, power plants, research ect. so everyone benefits instead of giving it away for free.

              • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Society benefits from children not growing up in extreme poverty

                True, but giving money for free isn’t a proper way of fighting with poverty. The proper way would be introducing reforms that make housing, healthcare and education fundamentally cheaper. That would be effective at fixing the very causes that make people impoverished

                • snooggums@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Making things cheaper doesn’t help people in extreme poverty who have no money.

                  Giving them money does!

                  • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Making things cheaper doesn’t help people in extreme poverty who have no money.

                    They have no money, because everything they need to live, is expensive!!!