• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    If we live in a system where the bad ones are allowed to exist, maybe we shouldn’t have them at all.

    • 5too@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I think that would be throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

      People who live in an area should be empowered to push back against outside interests coming in and changing things to the detriment of the residents, like the HOA posted earlier that protected their forest and watershed.

      The problem is that this power is often turned back onto the residents. This sounds to me like hyper-local politics - and so the answer is to get involved and vote out the assholes in power, not ban the existence of the political body!

      (Edit) I didn’t realize this, but some HOAs are controlled by outside developers, rather than local residents? That I can get behind banning!

    • cheddar@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      We don’t live in a black and white world. All or nothing mentality doesn’t bring good results, because you discard imperfect things in favor of worse things.