• mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    Biden loses

    OP blames the 5 tankies actually living in the USA for voting 3rd party

        • Hoomod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          They should have been preparing a replacement for Biden since he was sworn into office.

          Now… Who really knows. There’s so much at stake for more than the presidency. If the choices are between a 78 year old felon under multiple indictments who is only out for himself, and an 81 year old who wants to better the country but is, well, 81… I’ll take the 81 year old

          • Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Thank you for your ableism

            And no, the ‘problem’ is always people didn’t vote for their shit candidates & not that they ran a shit candidate.

  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Considering that Biden’s main competitor is an actual neonazi and the USA have an undemocratic election system that disadvantages all but two parties, there’s pretty much no choice but the senile grandpa who’s not a neonazi.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Still voting Biden, but this feels an awful lot like many past elections where people are holding their nose and voting for a candidate they don’t necessarily like just because they really don’t like the other candidate: Bush v Gore, Bush v Kerry, Clinton v Trump. Those elections never seem to turn out good.

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Íf he wore a clown suit and only spoke Pig-Latin during the debate… considering the alternative

    He would STILL be the only viable candidate worth voting for

  • Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    In their moral justification, the argument of the lesser evil has played a prominent role. If you are confronted with two evils, the argument runs, it is your duty to opt for the lesser one, whereas it is irresponsible to refuse to choose altogether. Its weakness has always been that those who choose the lesser evil forget quickly that they chose evil.

    -Hannah Arendt, German-American philosopher and political theorist, in fuckin 1964 lmao. some things never change!

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m going to assume that you’re being sarcastic.

          For those who think this is an option, remember that the MAGoos vote in every election.

          • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            IMO the disconnect lies in the fact that many don’t see Biden as the “lesser evil.” They want to vote for Biden, because they’ve been influenced to think it is the only option.

            Arendt is making an observation of a “no-win situation”.

            Voters want a solution to that situation, so they make assumptions to come to a conclusion that fits the narrative they tell themselves.

            Some, when faced with a no-win situation, choose to not play the game. Others, convince themselves that the lesser-evil is a desirable outcome. Many, myself included, want to “change the conditions of the test.”.

            There is no viable solution. All choices are valid and should be respected.

            • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              The only way to change the conditions of the test is to get out and support Left-leaning Dems in primaries.

              And no, not all choices are valid. Voting doesn’t just affect the voter, it affects the whole country.

              • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                You have no idea what I’m trying to communicate and it’s disconcerting to me. It’s a failure on my part to communicate effectively. I’m sorry.

                • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Keep at it. You learn by doing something; making a mistake; then doing it again a little better.

        • Zombie-Mantis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Then Congress would appoint the President. If, somehow, a Congress was also not elected, then the states would likely send delegates to do the same thing, but not all of Congress is even up for election.

    • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s a frigging figure of speech. It doesn’t literally mean both options are “evil” anytime it is used. And you’re not “choosing evil” by voting for Biden — not for the people whose lives will be ruined if Trump wins. For many you are preventing evil.

      If a few more people in a few states had chosen the “lesser evil” of Hillary over Trump, the Supreme Court wouldn’t be delivering supreme evil every few months for the foreseeable future.

      (I don’t need to hear about how Hillary did a bad job in the election — it doesn’t change the fact that the consequences are what they are.)

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah the Nazis would’ve never come to power if everyone just abstained from voting instead of coalescing under one lesser evil /s

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      This premise depends on the assumption that “everyone is stupid except for me!”

      We can sum up the sentiment as “don’t choose the lesser of two evils because you’re fucking moron that forgets things easily!”

      • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 months ago

        because you’re fucking moron that forgets things easily!"

        It’s more that the worst thing you’re willing to accept becomes the new normal.

        And then something that was previously unthinkable becomes thinkable. And then if you accept that because it’s the lesser evil, it becomes the new “new normal”. Continue in a downward spiral.

        Look at the state we’re in now, with Trump and Biden. That’s the result of decades of picking “the lesser evil”.

        At some point you have to say “no more”.

        • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          Agreed, and by this argument it will only get worse. The next versions of biden and trump will both be worse if we keep going the same route.

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          You’re ignoring the fact that people have been opting out of voting for decades.

          People in 1968 couldn’t bring themselves to vote for Humphrey, and we got Nixon.

          They couldn’t bear Jimmy Carter, and we got Reagan.

          “Both sides are the same” is the Right’s best pal.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          Tankie being triggered by reality… tale as old as… well not time… but as old as Stalin anyway.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      Except that Biden is in no way evil. Being old is not evil, and his administration has done a lot of great things.

      • Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s right, the man bypassing congress to ship weapons for Israel to bomb refugee tents with is actually a smol bean good guy, that’s SO true

  • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I think the real upsetting thing isn’t Biden’s performance, or having Biden as president for four more years. He achieved quite a bit after all. The real upsetting thing is the DNC being such cunts that they even pushed for this debate, hoping that Biden could win, only to deny and ignore Biden’s abhorrent performance immediately after. That Bernie got shafted twice by them, that is the really upsetting part.

    • whocares314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It seems pretty obvious to me at this point that the DNC would rather lose than have an actual progressive win. None of the shitty things that Trump wants to do will hurt them, (stupid take if they cared at all about their descendants but they’re either too arrogant or too ignorant to worry about that) but actual progressive policies that helped average people WOULD hurt their way of life. Marginally. Like, the tiniest little amount. Like, your yacht can only have one master bedroom instead of four. But why give that up when you don’t have to?

      “It’s a big club, and you ain’t in it”

      I’m voting for Biden though, and I’ll keep voting as progressively as possible in the down ballot elections. If a progressive movement from the bottom up can start by doing things like getting rid of FPTP, we still have a chance. And to anyone thinking about not voting, please do. The president is one person. They are the single most powerful person individually, (taking aside impact on the judicial system) but the collective impact on your day to day life is far more influenced by down ballot positions. Research your down ballot candidates and vote. Many of those races are decided by only a handful of votes. Yours matters.

      • crusa187@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        DNC would rather lose than have an actual progressive win

        This was made perfectly clear in 2016 when Hillary stole the nom by colluding with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.

        If people haven’t caught on by now, they haven’t been paying attention. Or are just willfully ignorant.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        It seems pretty obvious to me at this point that the DNC would rather lose than have an actual progressive win.

        It’s not in their interests to let a progressive win. Just like their counterpart, the DNC takes a shit ton of bribery donations from corporations lobbyists. Bringing in a progressive who would reform the system or push back against pro-corporate policies is biting the hands that feed them.

  • Delusional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well when the only other vote is fascism, hate, and bullying… Yeah we’re gonna vote for the not ridiculous choice.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      I mean the alternative is literally fascism. Not the silly internet “fascism” that’s just about someone that disagrees with you that you perceive is right of you on some silly made up political spectrum. Actual full blown fascism.

      So yeah you need to vote for Joe Biden.

  • Grayox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    I am a tankie and voting for Biden lmao. The Prolitariat must be protected till enough class conciousness is achieved for Socialism to succeed.

    • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      And I’d vote for a corpse before I vote for 34 time Convicted Felon Donald Trump. Eat the rich. Pack the courts. Seize the assets of felonious companies.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      You get it! We can’t fuck over vulnerable people. We can’t abandon minorities and LGBT people. Even if we let things get worse to the point of a societal collapse, a lot of people will die because of it – and societal collapse has not historically led to better societies down the road.

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s such an important point. Anyone who thinks a win by Trump will somehow speed up the advent of socialism is just deluded.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          People think Trump will eventually make things so bad that the average man will salivate at the chance for Socialist rule…

          What will actually happen if you get a nasty concoction made from a pinch of Handmaid’s Tale with a dash of Holocaust 2…

          And the average man won’t care, as long as the trains run on time and they owned the libs… and if the trains don’t run on time, they probably have libs to blame.

          • daltotron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            trains run on time

            I am here to regretfully inform you about the state of american rail infrastructure…

      • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        My trans friends are what keeps me committed to voting Biden no matter how disappointed I am in him. Things are already really scary for them right now and I can’t be complicit in making them worse, even through inaction.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          Consider me another one of your trans friends. If Trump gets elected I’m probably gonna die in a concentration camp. Don’t do that to me, don’t do that to them. I’m begging you for my life.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          I am trans and not voting for Biden. I refuse to sacrifice Palestinians for my own safety or the safety of my loved ones. All the stuff people say now about them being an acceptable sacrifice or there being nothing they can do about it, that’s what they’ll be saying about us tomorrow. Solidarity between marginalized groups is the only viable strategy for long term survival.

          I hate being used as a rhetorical token to make people feel better about selling out another vulnerable group.

          • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I respect this decision. But, I’m selfishly voting for Biden. Trump’s first term stressed me out.

              • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Thoughtful, educated and informed voting decisions should be respected. Shame on this duopoly for forcing its electorate to choose between tacit support for a genocide, and outright fascism.

                • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Thank you. I have to vote according to my conscience and what I believe is right, but if someone else’s conscience tells them differently, I can make my case but ultimately it is their decision to make. So many people on here expect everyone to think and see things the exact same way as them and can’t even seem to imagine someone having different values or a different perspective, and that can be very frustrating.

          • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            If you actually cared you would vote biden. No one capable of it will save the Palestinians. None. At least with biden someone survives.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              If our “democracy” has decayed to the point where I’m not able to vote on whether or not we do a genocide, then it is not a democracy and I should not legitimize the sham through participation.

              There is no circumstance under which I will support genocide. If that means I die, then I will die. If any of you had a backbone you’d do the same. And if enough people drew that line, they’d have no choice but to listen to us.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Trans people are not a monolith. There’s other trans people in this thread begging us to vote for Biden for their safety. Your feelings about being a rhetorical token are not invalid, but recognize that other people in your vulnerable group are legitimately crying out for help.

            Either way, I’m glad I’m not one of your loved ones. Your own safety is one thing. Their safety is another.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              They’re entitled to their views, as I am to mine.

              I will do whatever I can to protect my loved ones and ensure they retain access to their meds. But I cannot go against the dictates of my conscience. And as I said, in the long term, solidarity between marginalized groups is the only viable path forward and I will not sacrifice that long term strategy for some fleeting, half-hearted protection. In fact I’ve already seen people applying the “lesser evil” argument to sacrificing trans rights since I posted this. Only by uniting and drawing a red line do we have a chance in the long run.

      • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Biden is literally arming a genocide. He was even adamant about his continued support for that. Meanwhile Dems led cities have brutally beaten up peaceful colelge protests and invited fascist MAGA mobs to attack minority students there.

        The DNC and Biden do not protect minorities. They are white supremacists with just a bit more moderation to the means they employ, but they will absolutely resort to authoritarian crackdowns if they feel the minorities to step out of line by demanding justice and rights.

    • glitchdx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      You sound like a rational tankie, which by the definitions that lemmies have explained to me, would make you not a tankie.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        “Anyone who thinks themselves a tankie is too self aware to be one” sounds like one of those fallacies you’d learn about in highschool. (What is a tankie, btw? I’ve been too scared to ask…)*

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          A tankie is, broadly, someone who wants to effect left-wing ideology using authoritarian methods. It originally referred to those who defended the USSR using tanks to suppress the Hungarian Revolution, but it could be aptly used to describe those who defend China’s actions in Tiananmen Square. It’s rightfully used as a perjorative, since authoritarian enforcement is antithetical to leftism, particularly communism.

          Tankies are hypocrites who didn’t understand their self-proclaimed ideologies. If someone’s idea of communist praxis is lining up dissenters for the firing squad, you’re dealing with a tankie.

          • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            wants to effect left-wing ideology using authoritarian methods

            Odd. I’m getting called a tankie because I just won’t vote for Biden (or Trump). Someone must have gotten confused.

            • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              By their reasoning:

              No vote for Biden is a vote for Trump. Trump is fascist and authoritarian. Tankies are authoritarians. Therefore, you are a tankie. /s

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              Lots of people say lots of silly things, nonetheless Trump is worse for the proletariat than Biden, and turning your nose up at the lesser evil endangers real people when the greater evil wins. You don’t have to vote for the greater evil to help tip the scales in their favor. Accelerationism is authoritarianism with extra steps and no one in the driver’s seat.

              • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Biden doesn’t accept blame for tipping the scales in their favor. Biden’s family doesn’t accept blame for tipping the scales in their favor. Biden’s campaign doesn’t accept blame for tipping the scales in their favor. The DNC leadership doesn’t accept blame for tipping the scales in their favor. People who voted for Biden in the 2020 primaries don’t accept blame for tipping the scale in their favor. Moderaters and political analysts don’t accept blame for tipping the scales in their favor. People like you letting those people get away with that and focusing on telling me to be quiet and vote for Biden don’t accept blame for tipping the scales in their favor.

                I don’t accept blame for it either.

                • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  IDGAF who does or doesn’t accept blame for whatever. I care about material results; my future, my family’s future, my neighbors’ futures, the future of the people who live in this country, and this world. IDGAF how ideologically pure a politician is, or who’s wrong or right, or who gets away with whatever. I care about the people who are going to suffer if the Federalists, Fascists, and Fundamentalists keep establishing their foothold judge by judge, bill by bill, ruling by ruling.

                  This isn’t grade school, this isn’t a game, this isn’t about fair. There are real stakes here. People will die. I’m not heartless enough to play the blame game with lives on the line. I’m voting harm reduction because I’m an adult and I play the hand I’m dealt. Righteously losing doesn’t help anything but ego-centric deontology.

            • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Tankies have read Marx and Engels, yes, but there are many other forms of leftism and even other forms of communism that aren’t ML. You are right about ML communists, in particular, but many other leftist movements are anti-authoritarian by their nature, so the point still stands.

              Also, it’s possible to do the reading and disagree with the methods of implementation. I agree with the economics and the stated goals of communism, but I don’t believe authoritarianism is the best way to go about it.

                • Belastend@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  You completely disregard, that the soviet union did number 3 and crushed all unions not falling in line. Or that they ignore the will of the proletariat during the 1917 and 1918 elections numerous times.

                  The authoritarian way isnt being critized for coming down on Capitalists. Its critized for how it treated every deviation from the party line. And especially, how it turned into a political chess game at the top, which prioritized amassing personal power and wealth over the actual well being of the state.

                • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I hop off the train at the part where the top-down dictatorship comes into play. Probably a bit before the level of authoritarianism where the Joseph Stalin type starts killing people for having a dissenting opinion, and what not.

                  Using the state to enforce good wages and end the terribleness of the stock market/landlord culture does not need to involve a top down dictatorship and a lack of democracy.

                  I know about the “dictatorship of the proletariat” and all that, and in my opinion, it should involve all of the workers, not one person or a small group of people. A top down dictatorship just makes it all that easier for the party to be infiltrated and controlled by bourgeois interests. If said dictatorship is a true democracy, with each worker having an equal say, it makes it pretty hard to control the proles.

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              There’s a difference between someone-needs-to-coordinate-and-manage-complex-undertakings “authoritarian” and line-the-dissidents-up-against-the-wall “authoritarian”. Tankies are the latter.

        • glitchdx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I am by no means an expert, but the test that was explained to me is that if you look at the famous tianamen square picture of the guy holding grocery bags facing down a line of tanks, and then proceed to side with the line of tanks, then you’re a tankie.

          When I say that I am not an expert, what I actually mean is that I’m a random idiot from the internet, so don’t take anything I say as gospel truth.

          I’ve only been on lemmy for a few months, and I’ve never heard the term tankie on any other platform. My understanding is that a tankie is a militant supporter of communism, who completely disregards (or is in support of) how every time it’s ever actually been done it turns into an authoritarian dictatorship (or something similarly unpleasant to live under).

          My own biases exposed: I am an american, and most of what I know I learned in the absolutely fucked american public education system, which says communism = evil, because of the red scare a while back.

          If you do some googling, there’s a wikipedia article on the subject. I’ve forgotten most of the content of that article shortly after I read it, I should look at it again and maybe it will stick this time.

        • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          People that are happy to run people over in tanks to force their communist version of society on everyone else.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I’m a tankie. What tankie is supposed to mean is someone who blindly supports anything anyone does so long as they claim to be communist and wave a red flag. There’s maybe a handful of edgy teens who actually fit that description, but the way it’s actually used is to punch left at anyone who supports anything a socialist country has ever done, or who is insufficiently patriotic/nationalistic and is willing to consider things from an internationalist perspective.

          If you say for example that Cuba under Castro had a successful literacy program, then there are people who will accuse you of being a tankie just for that. Because it gets used this way, some people like myself chose to reclaim the insult and wear it proudly.

          Generally, the actual term for most “tankies” would be Marxist-Leninist. But I actually prefer tankie because it’s a more general, big tent label. It’s used so broadly that even anarchists can be called tankies. It’s basically like “woke” where it doesn’t actually have any real meaning.

          • uis@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            If you say for example that Cuba under Castro had a successful literacy program, then there are people who will accuse you of being a tankie just for that.

            $COUNTRY had a successful literacy program under $LEFT_GOVERMENT.

          • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Well I think there are probably a half dozen interpretations that people on Lemmy use. One I have heard repeated is that they view the Tiananmen Square event as something that China rightfully did… hence “Tankie”

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              The idea that that’s the origin of the term is a common misconception. The actual origin was about the USSR under Kruschev sending in the military in response to a rebellion in Hungary. Some British communists supported the move, while other communists opposed it and labeled the supporters as tankies.

              But regardless of the origin, it’s changed to where now it’s liberals using it to criticize socialists in general.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      On one hand I’d like it if the Democrats put up someone more certain to beat Trump. On the other Joe has shown he supports labor and things are moving in the right direction in that regard. I’d hate it if he we get a corpo Democrat that halts this progress.

    • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The Prolitariat must be protected

      By consenting to corruption and a path to WWIII. That is not protecting them, in fact it is ensuring them a terrible future. If you cared about them, you would vote, volunteer, donate, and support the PSL, CPUSA, or Green party instead.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Lmao the green party isn’t going to do jack shit. They’re completely unserious about politics. They aren’t even trying to build up an infrastructure in all 50 states that lets them get suffused into local and state politics. They aren’t even aiming for Congressional seats, which would be necessary for an actual Green president to get anything done.

        They’re just anti science grifters who think wifi causes cancer, entertain vaccine skepticism, and demonize nuclear energy – the latter of which could be a major asset to stopping global warming. Newer designs are even able to consume nuclear waste, meaning an anti nuclear position results in more waste than we would otherwise.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I actually had my local Socialist Party USA chapter kick me out, ban me from their facebook, and publicly announce that I’m a rape apologist because I wouldn’t tell people to support an openly transphobic “Vaccines Cause Autism” Green Party candidate over Joe Biden.

        • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Then support the PSL. I work with the Green party to improve it, because that’s how democracy works. It’s okay you don’t understand that.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’m afraid all of us don’t have that much free time. But hey, if you can get them to stop being anti science and actually become a serious party, I’ll consider them.

            Just don’t expect me to accept the Green Party’s many imperfections. If you don’t accept the Democrat’s imperfections, then you should perfectly understand.

            • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Send them an email and discuss your issues. They are the only voice in politics that supports the science of climate change.

              Democrats don’t have imperfections, they are fundamentally flawed because they are corrupt.

              • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Until Stein vehemently recants her remarks about WiFi causing cancer, vaccine skepticism, and nuclear fear mongering – or the Green party completely disavows her and those remarks – it would be a total waste of time.

                It isn’t my job as an engineer to tell “the only voice in politics that supports the science of climate change” to stop endorsing completely anti science positions. Nor is it on me to try and correct a willfully anti science party. They need to show good faith, and they’ve done nothing whatsoever to suggest any of that to me.

                • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2suVx9cDKw She is the one with a medical degree, so you don’t have any authority over her opinion, sounds reasonable for her to make her stance out of concern, even if she is wrong.

                  I’m also an engineer, and that’s why I use my knowledge to try to influence the party.

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        None of those parties have a ghost of a chance of winning, and with as razor thin as the win margins were in 2016 and 2020, I’m not confident Biden will win if we don’t vote for him. I sincerely hope I do not have to explain why Trump would be worse on literally every issue (especially Gaza) than Biden is.

        • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Then do something about it instead of complain. I am, what are you doing? You vote for corruption.

          • Nelots@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Nobody likes voting for the lesser of two evils, but we all have to if we want to stop an even further decline into hell. Our system is broken, and we don’t have any way of fixing it immediately, so we have to work with what we can. Trump as president will have immediate and direct consequences for many people, and it will be the fault of people like you that it happened. At this point, not voting for Biden is the same thing as voting for Trump. You may continue virtue signaling after we get through the crisis right in front of us.

            • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              You’re not voting for the lesser of two evils, you are voting for corruption and evil while doing absolutely nothing about it.

              • gladflag@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                You’re voting for no one, giving more of a chance for the greater of two evils and still doing nothing. Where your fucking guillotine?

              • pivot_root@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                The system is set up in a way that the only viable options are between two evils, unfortunately. Under a FPTP system where the only good options are minority parties that won’t win a single seat in their districts, you’re left with the choice of voting for the lesser evil, or voting for your morals but increasing the risk of the greater evil winning.

                It’s a no-win situation.

                • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  No, you can vote for whoever you want. You all on here are too lazy to gather support for another party.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Bro’s protest voting when the Weimar American Republic has Nazis on the ballot and thinks building “grassroots support” for the twentieth year in a row justifies it when the world is about to run out of time anyways

            You want Green candidates? Tell them to run as Democrats or make a fucking militia.

            • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Dems are actually fascists, and you are as well for not only voting for them, but gathering support for them online when you could be doing that for a decent party.

              • pivot_root@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                The Democrat party is just as corrupt and bought out by corporations as the Republicans are, but at least they aren’t trying to get the country to circle the drain as quickly.

              • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Yes, yes, we all know what happens when you scratch a liberal but it’s better than not having to scratch to find it. Even if all that’s holding the powers that be back is a skin-deep veneer of civility and deniability a vote to strip that veneer away makes you a fool, not a revolutionary.

                • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  it’s better than not having to scratch to find it.

                  There’s no need to scratch. They openly support the genocide of children.

                  The real fool is the one that puts no effort into change.

  • febra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah… sure. Not a tankie, I’m European and don’t care about influencing you to vote for one or another. But after seeing Biden “debate” Trump I know the dems are fucked. I mean sure, still go out and vote, but I honestly don’t see many people doing so.

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Absolutely go vote. Tell everyone you know to vote. Don’t vote for Trump. But for the love of god, if you’re otherwise not going to vote, at least vote third party.

    • chakan2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The Dems are intentionally throwing it. It’s the only thing that makes sense at this point. The “Not Trump” donations are lucrative, and there’s no way the R’s will make insider trading illegal.

      This might be the spark we need for a legitimate progressive party though. Or we get a civil war, who knows.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s honestly extremely sad that the primary requirement to be a leader is “ability to speak perfectly on stage for 2 hours.”

      • BluesF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        It should be a basic requirement of literally any public office. That fact that we have got this far baffles me utterly.

      • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah it’s not great, but like… coming across as coherent is important no matter the position. Biden kinda failed that basic competency test, probably just due to his age and not like, stupidity or a personal failing of any kind. I’m still voting for Biden, but yeah it’s not exactly an enthusiastic vote.

  • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m voting against Trump. Not thrilled to have a president who might have to have his Oval Office relocated to a nursing home.

  • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’d vote for ToS era Pike over Trump. I’d vote for a candidate who only communicates via ouija board over Trump. I’d vote to not have a president for 4 years before I’d vote for Trump.

    It’s crazy that Trump can get convicted of fraud, be found liable for sexual assault, promise to abuse presidential power to get revenge against those who cross him, actively undermine both national and global security, promise to round up millions and put them into camps, attempt to overthrow the election and refuse to not try it again, and so on, and his side is still so loyal they’ll wear solidarity diapers for him.