• Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    4 months ago

    He seems to be confusing “freeware”, which is basically a license for copyrighted work, with “public domain”, which is the absence of a copyright.

    • Elise@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeah, but anything you create automatically has a copyright, so for example this comment is not in the public domain. Its use is limited to the context I am using it in; that is, I expect it to be copied for federation purposes, but I wouldn’t say that AI is covered in this context, just genuine readership, moderation, and bots that are ‘part of the community’.

      At least that’s the EU stance afaik. Like if I saw this comment on a billboard somewhere I’d see that as a clear breach of copyright and even privacy.

      • Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Thats a great way to put it in a simple way: its wrong to use other peoples content for things they did not expect they would be.

        • Elise@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Well, it’s one thing to say an ‘artificial agent’ looks at someone’s work on deviant art and learns from it. It’s another to use that to make money, as I personally can’t imagine many of the posters would have been on board with that.