Conservative activists, led by a local pastor and outspoken Israel advocate, pushed the district, Mission CISD, to excise books mostly about gender, sexuality and race. Their demands represented an extreme version of a nationwide culture war over books that has played out in recent years — and ensnared a number of books with Jewish themes.

In Mission, the long list of books on the chopping block includes a recent illustrated adaptation of Anne Frank’s diary; both volumes of Art Spiegelman’s Holocaust graphic memoir “Maus”; “The Fixer,” Bernard Malamud’s novel about a historical instance of antisemitic blood libel; and “Kasher in the Rye,” a ribald memoir by Jewish comedian Moshe Kasher.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Are conservatives activists so concerned with information related to living under Nazism because they don’t want young people to be able to recognize the steps if those steps occur to young people today?

      • candyman337@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not it’s 100% tied to the resurgence of white supremacy. These conservatives groups are backed by humongous PACs that fund groups that push their agenda. Just like with turningpointusa and groups like that. Don’t mistake careful planning masked by racist zealots as idiocy.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      i cannot believe how openly anti-nazi some books are! we should burn these intolerant books!

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, but the New Testament says everyone who doesn’t worship Jesus is going to burn in hell forever, so that kind of lessens the whole Jewishness of the first half.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        We have these people who go to college and get specialized degrees so that they can do things and work in school libraries and figure out what books are appropriate for the school.

        You might have heard of them. They’re called librarians.

        Deciding what books do and don’t belong in a library is literally part of their job. I know, because I’m married to one. She used to work in a school library, now she works in a public library. It was a Catholic school (she’s an atheist, they didn’t discriminate) and they trusted her to figure out which books were appropriate for their kids because of her degree. What does that tell you about librarians?

        • SPRUNT@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          It tells me that they are obviously evil because they don’t blindly support a white Christian authoritarian regime.

          /s

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            The funny thing is that I know for a fact that there are Trump supporters who work in the library where my wife works (one is a cis woman with a mustache who must be mistaken for trans regularly, which surprised me), and they also don’t approve of this shit. I mean yeah, they’re total hypocrites, but they still don’t support these book bans.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        We had like everything, from childrens books to engineering stuff. It’s filed differently so your fragile mind won’t need to see “adult” books if you don’t want to I guess.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          My fragile mind doesnt want minors to see things they shouldnt see till later. That should be a pretty obvious thing that everyone wants for children…

          • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Get rid of anything that mentions rape, prostitution, genocide, or god forbid SODOMY?

            Out goes the bible then. No one under 18 should read it.

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              The difference between the Bible and other more modern books is that the Bible is the most influential book in western civilization. If you want to have a censored on that removed those exact passages then that seems like a reasonable compromise.

              • maniclucky@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Fuck that, the wretched thing doesn’t deserve special treatment. There is nothing about the contents of the bible that are worth granting exception for. You want to ban adult themes? I can think of nothing more deserving of such a ban than the oldest book to incorporate rape, divinely ordained murder (all over the place), instructions on how to perform an abortion, incest, and the severly mixed message of “god loves everyone, unless you don’t worship them, then you get tortured forever”.

                • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Like it or not the Bible is the most influence book in western history, so yes it gets special treatment. But again, if you want to make a censored version for kids that takes out those parts, it seems like a reasonable compromise.

          • Jank@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I like how this argument assumes schools are just regularly stocking school libraries with your Literotica history.

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              I didnt say they were. If its not happening very often why are you guys so against books being removed?

              • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                If it’s not happening often, why are you hellbent on banning books? They are edge case, but your ilk act like every school library is chuck full of inappropriate books.

                • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I am hellbent on protecting children from adults that will do them harm. If its only edge cases then why are you hellbent on putting rules in place to remove questionable books?

          • cammoblammo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I’ve worked in school libraries.

            The funny thing is that kids will only read things that are of interest to them, and if they’re interested in it, they’re old enough to read it. If they borrow it because they like the cover or all their friends have apparently read it or some such reason, you can be assured it’ll be returned after they get through the first page.

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              I understand, but there are literally millions of books, why do we have to have the few books with sexual material that a significant portion of parents object to?

      • Xanis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Which books do you believe shouldn’t be provided in a classroom setting?

        No copouts. I don’t think anyone expects a bunch of 3rd graders to have a discussion on 50 Shades of Grey.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think the opinion as to what shouldnt be in public schools is reasonable, and I am cool if we are overly restrictive if there is a reason that is good and is supported by enough people.

          • Xanis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            You didn’t answer my question. Let’s try a different one. Once again without copping out: Give us a couple good reasons for why a book should be restricted in education.

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              Books should be restricted from education if a significant portion of the adults dont think its appropriate for children. This could include any variety of reasons they dont think its appropriate.

              • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Will each book be voted on individually? How does that work in your head? I doubt that people read minimally an excerpt of each book to decide and ban them.

                • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Probably do it on a complaint basis. Each school district could have a diverse board and they could look at the books that people dont like and if X out of Y think it should be removed, then remove it. Does that work for you?

      • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It isn’t about them being available. Its about discussing the content and the deeper meaning. I would be totally fine with reading Adolf Hitlers - Mein Kampf in School, as long as the content gets discussed and why what he wrote wasn’t good.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Nothing is going to be discusses it would just be sitting on the shelf and available. So I think we should all agree that censorship of books in public schools makes sense. I personally am fine with siding on the side of being more cautious and having kids less able to get books people think are not acceptable, and catching books that probably should be available in schools.

          • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Censoring books due to reasons like “these books provide a point of view I’m not comfortable exposing my kids too” is usually a bad reason to censor books.

            Problem I see is its all a pendulum on these issues where the reaction swings wildly back and forth the more energy were putting into it rather than having it settle the fuck down.

            For instance these books being removed aren’t produced in spite of this issue. But for sure if we dig into censorship topic then pro censorship groups start bringing out books to be edgy cunts and prove a point.

            Every issue has edge cases and we live in a time where people are so willing to be right they will make every edge case the center of an issue. Like in order to keep Maus on shelves we will now need to have a copy of Bomb making 101 or a book were one of these people wrote FUCK a million times just so they can get anti censorship people to say “hey that isn’t cool guys” but also the problem is I often find people are so militant in our beliefs that we have a hard time saying “that isn’t cool” when faced with something not cool but also that grinds against our moral beliefs

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              What you are saying makes sense, I just dont see an issue if XX% of people dont want a book to be in PUBLIC schools, then I am okay with restricting it unless there is some kind of cultural significance, and within reason. I am probably okay with Maus from what I have heard, but I dont see it as an issue to take it off the shelf if people feel strongly and there is some level of logic.

          • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            If kids are only exposed to kid friendly stuff, then they will never learn anything and stay kids long into adulthood.

          • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            You do realise that there’s a version of Mien Kampf that’s four times as long because there’s several experts annotating and debunking Hitler’s ideas right there on the page.

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Thats fine, what would be so bad if a signficant part of the population dont think its appropriate so its not provided to kids at a public school?

              • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                What would be so bad with…

                …checks notes…

                …informing young people about the most horrible decisions made throughout history, why they were flawed, and how not to repeat the same mistakes today?

                Hmm…

                Just take a look at the world around you. That’s a fucking start…

              • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                History is uncomfortable. Revising it to tell lovely stories is all well and good for building a national identity.

                However, sugar-coating, ignoring, or even flat-out erasing parts of history benefits no one. People started writing events down accurately because the orators of old never intended paint an accurate picture of the past. And therefore lessons learnt from the failures of humanity (lost causes, preventable catastrophies, perspectives of people on the wrong side, genocides, etc.) were also lost.

                History should be uncomfortable, so we can collectively learn and have a chance to do better the next time.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                A significant part of the population doesn’t think it’s appropriate for a picture book about two male penguins that adopt a chick to be in a public school.

                In fact, a significant part of the population doesn’t think white kids and black kids should go to the same school. And have found ways to do things about it.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Segregation_academy

                Why should we cater to these significant parts of the population?

        • cammoblammo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          If you put that book in a kindergarten library, I can guarantee none of the kids will read it.

          The only two reasons not to have it are 1) budget and 2) space. Use the room and money for books the kids will read.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s very difficult to avoid comparing right wing America to fascists when they have this much of a problem with Maus.

    • lets_get_off_lemmy@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I’m definitely not for banning books, but couldn’t you say the same thing about news media? Or Facebook memes? Those “get you to think”.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t support banning memes or the news either, but they aren’t under attack currently.

  • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    local pastor and outspoken Israel advocate

    Anne Frank’s diary

    Art Spiegelman’s Holocaust graphic memoir

    Israel advocate

    Anne Frank’s diary

    Israel advocate

    Anne Frank’s diary

    You fucking disgrace

    Get out of my country

    For some reason this made me way more irrationally angry than just killing Palestinians. It’s killing Palestinians and running cover for the people who killed Anne Frank and Spiegelman’s brother, and doing it all at the exact same time with no sense of shame or embarrassment but, I’m sure, a smug sense of superiority like everyone else is the monster in this

    This guy better really hope that there isn’t a hell

    • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Hey man. If it looks like a Nazi, walks like a Nazi and quacks like a Nazi, it’s probably a Nazi

  • exanime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    well the USA was circling the drain after Trump’s first win… they are now at the toilet gargling stage

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      This isn’t the USA. It’s one school district in one state. I know you aren’t bright enough to separate the two, but it would be like saying because the far right has made inroads in French election, then all of Europe is in the toilet.

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        This isn’t the USA.

        Texas is, believe it or not, the USA. Since 1845 even.

        I know you aren’t bright enough to separate the two

        Big words from a pathetic person.

        it would be like saying because the far right has made inroads in French election, then all of Europe is in the toilet.

        Imagine existing in 2024 and not yet noticing the global trend towards Fascism in a world with increasing economic unfairness that’s about to experience a worldwide climate disaster that will displace a billion people, handing a massive opportunity to the far right to take control.

        But no, the right wing is no big deal. Just ignore what’s happening in Texas and France (and everywhere else), it’s not important.