It might mean that technically, but the organization itself is domestic terrorism at this point. You can label anything you want, doesn’t change the actions of the members.
Introduced, not passed. They are not a terror organization and calling them as such is an attempt to discredit a political movement for the sake of fascists and racists. There have been analyses, reports, and studies that have concluded that antifa is not a major domestic terrorism risk.
Introduced congressional resolutions are not known for their objectivism. I’m not saying the opposite is true, only that what something is has very little to do with what individual political figures want it to be. I mean, Indiana tried to legislate the value of π to be exactly 3.
Antifa literally means anti-fascist. The guys who stormed the beaches of Normandy were “antifa.”
It might mean that technically, but the organization itself is domestic terrorism at this point. You can label anything you want, doesn’t change the actions of the members.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-resolution/279
This has been known for years now.
What “organization”? There is no antifa “organization”. Anti-fascism is an ideology. If you are opposed to fascism, you are anti-fascist.
Don’t worry. I’m not accusing you of being opposed to fascism.
I’m just going based off the congressional bills labeling them domestic terrorists, that’s all.
Congressional bills proposed by … fascists?
The bill you reference was introduced by an outspoken fascist, though. So that makes sense.
Also, the bill was not adopted.
That’s not “all.” You’re a fascism apologist.
Introduced, not passed. They are not a terror organization and calling them as such is an attempt to discredit a political movement for the sake of fascists and racists. There have been analyses, reports, and studies that have concluded that antifa is not a major domestic terrorism risk.
Introduced congressional resolutions are not known for their objectivism. I’m not saying the opposite is true, only that what something is has very little to do with what individual political figures want it to be. I mean, Indiana tried to legislate the value of π to be exactly 3.