Surprisingly based from ND, to be completely honest

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    While I think mandatory retirement ages need to be discussed across the board on all three branches, it’s a cheap shot and unconstitutional

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Because right now there are no age limitations in the Constitution for elected officials. A state cannot change that, it needs a constitutional amendment.

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The are age requirements for minimum age but not limited age. You would have to have a constitutional amendment to change that.