First insight: 42 key points of the secret #EUGoingDark surveillance plan for the new EU Commission
www.patrick-breyer.de
After Sunday‘s European elections, the EU is planning to reintroduce indiscriminate communications data retention without suspicion and force manufacturers to allow law enforcement access to digital devices such as smartphones and cars. This is the “confidential” 42-point plan compiled by a “high-le

cross-posted from: https://feddit.de/post/12846267

After Sunday‘s European elections, the EU is planning to reintroduce indiscriminate communications data retention without suspicion and force manufacturers to allow law enforcement access to digital devices such as smartphones and cars.

Specifically, according to the 42-point surveillance plan, manufacturers are to be legally obliged to make digital devices such as smartphones, smart homes, IoT devices, and cars monitorable at all times (“access by design”). Messenger services that were previously securely encrypted are to be forced to allow for interception.

The secure encryption of metadata and subscriber data is to be prohibited. Where requested by the police, GPS location tracking should be activated by service providers (“tracking switch”).

The EU Commission has already contributed specific proposals to the surveillance plan, according to two presentations obtained by the Pirates.

Make sure to vote in the upcoming elections!

  • zweieuro@lemmy.worldEnglish
    19·
    6 months ago

    As someone who sees these articles, who should I not vote for? Is there some ranking for ‘most asshole-ish politician’ regarding the EU? I know every politician has somewhat dirt on them but I’d love to know what to avoid since apparently some of those turds are worse than others.

    • far_university1990@feddit.deEnglish
      13·
      6 months ago

      If want more what patrick breyer doing, he is pirate party.

      Von der leyen is cdu, some call her zensursula (censor-sula), her first name is ursula.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zipEnglish
        8·
        6 months ago

        About UvdL - one can also google about her and Azerbaijan, her and Russia, her and defense ministry.

        Censorship is consistent with her other undertakings, but is not morally the worst of them.

      • barsoap@lemm.eeEnglish
        1·
        6 months ago

        He’s a judge by profession, btw. Any law weasel’s worst nightmare.

    • Unskilled5117@feddit.deOPEnglish
      6·
      6 months ago

      It depends on the country you live in. You will have to research that. As a rule of thumb, it is conservative/ right wing parties pushing for heavier surveillance of citizens.

      As it stands right now, the Eu parliament (which consists of people who we vote in to office), is the government body which opposes these measures. But there are only a few member countries left in the parliament which do that, so our votes are important!

      • lltnskyc@monero.townEnglish
        12·
        6 months ago

        it is conservative/ right wing parties pushing for heavier surveillance of citizens.

        My experience is totally different, although of course I don’t know the situation in whatever country you’re from.
        Arguably, the main reason for surveillance (being able to read your communication) is to be able to censor you (prevent you from posting/saying things somebody else doesn’t like) or even punish you for something you say.
        And I don’t see how can anyone argue that it is not the left that wants to censor everything and punish people for things they say :)

        If somebody wants to actually try arguing it, please answer the following question (in parentheses I’ll leave the suggested answer 😉, but let me know if yours are different)

        • Why is almost every free speech site is a right-wing site, and not a left-wing one? (because they are extremist, and we need to censor and jail them! but it is okay, because they are the bad ones and we are the good ones.)
        • Is it okay to criticize alphabet people (and call them alphabet people ig 🙃), post statistics of violent crimes by race, and generally speak bad about minorities? (nooo, you can’t do that, we should protect minorities no matter what the reality is, you should be censored and jailed!)
        • Is it okay to tell people what is actually happening in Ukraine and what atrocities Zelensky’s regime is committing? (nooo, you can’t do that, you’re a fascist and/or russian bot/propagandist, it’s all a lie even if you provide us with credible/primary sources, we should censor you as soon as possible for propaganda or misinformation or something and definitely jail you!)
    • plactagonic@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      6·
      6 months ago

      From some more articles I grasped that it is shady. Some lobbying groups, secret commissions and stuff like that. They try really hard to not be the ones to point fingers at.