• Schmoo@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I disagree. Memes are powerful tools and by denying ourselves the use of popular memes we grant “the enemy” an enormous advantage. Better we acknowledge that the issue is not the meme itself, but how it is used.

    • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      But there is an issue with the meme itself. It often associates whiteness (notice how the chad is explicitly a white guy with blonde hair and blue eyes) with being good/right, or physical characteristics associated with ‘stupidity’ (drooling, dented head) with being wrong. The underlying white supremacy & ableism is still there.

      And no, we shouldn’t compromise on our values to use popular memes.

      • jwiggler@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I dunno, I see your point but does the guy on the left really have a dented head? I thought those were forehead lines from emotional agitation. Also, where is the drool? I only see tears. I don’t really see the inherent ableism, as much as I see a negative representation things like lack of emotional regulation, “neckbeardyness,” etc. I agree moreso on the whiteness and general tidyness of the chad, and the association of beauty with good and ugliness with bad – I kinda buy your argument there. It is pretty shit that we do that, but I don’t necessarily think it’s wrong for the OP to use this meme template. Ignorant? Maybe.

        I feel like you could use similar strategies to decry any meme. For example, the glorification of violence through imagery and use of the word “weapon” in your own meme. Obviously, I’m not going to seriously suggest you’re perpetuating the glorification of violence through your meme, but I kinda think its the same with OPs meme.

        Edit: to be clear, all my thoughts on this are entirely from the last 20 min. I assumed you’ve thought more about this subject than me, so I consider myself pretty swayable. But idk, my initial reaction is that we’re looking too far into a meme.

        • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          When I talk about dented head and drools, I’m not referring to this soyjak in particular (which is far from the worst), but many who are commonly used have that, such as this one (obvious CW for ableism)

          Sorry for the confusion there!

          (to clarify, I don’t think OP had any shitty intentions. but that’s why we should point out this stuff IMO, because it slips through the cracks and even people with good intentions can unknowingly spread shitty ideologies. I’m certainly not free of blame either)

          as for the rest… well yea, no piece of media is morally without faults, memes included. but in the case of wojaks, I fell like the faults are high and obvious enough that we should still avoid using them.

          • jwiggler@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Oh yeah that one is bad, you’re right. Also the meme with the bell curve is definitely ableist. Hmm, you definitely bring up good points. Gotta chew on it a little. Much of this is just ingrained in us.