• Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    On one hand yes, knowingly endangering lives like that could be worth a heftier fine, on the other hand everything made plus ten percent seems like a pretty good fine to use if you want to actually discourage behavior across the board.

    • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      6 months ago

      Exactly. Fines don’t work for corporations or the mega wealthy because they don’t have teeth. Pegging the fine to the actual income earned from the crime, and ensuring it’s no longer more profitable to just pay the fine and continue doing what you’re doing, is like, the only way to continue if we want to use fines as a deterrent.

      • The_v@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Pegging the fine against the personal assets of the executives/board responsible for the crime would be more effective.

        Fining a corporation just hurts the the employees.

        • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          I mean, that’s fair. We can talk specifics, just something to make sure the fine has teeth. How we decide to do that is another topic.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, this should be the standard. No fixed penalty amounts, no negotiated settlements. Revenue +10% would be a great standard.

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Reminder that it’s all revenue PLUS 10%. So it effectively makes whatever bullshit money making scheme they want to use, cost money instead.

        • Wooki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Good to know you dont mind the profiteering off fraud.

          Fine is a penalty, not a cost of business, not a sales tax. A penalty.

          100k fine on 1 mill refund is nothing. 1 mill fine on 1 mill refund is a fine.

          • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            My guy. Reading comprehension. I did not say 10%. I said 10% ON TOP OF ANY EARNINGS.

            As in, if a corp earns 1 million, the fine levied would be 1.1 million.

            Christ, go back to 2nd grade.

        • Wooki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Its a 100% refund with a 10% fine. Dont conflate the refunded fraudulent sales with the fine.