• Kanzar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Iirc the increase in people driving instead of flying due to 911, lead to more accidents and deaths. :(

      • ggppjj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Well, it doesn’t really contribute to less people that much considering the global birth rate, and also it removes a usable car from service that will at this moment be replaced using materials and processes that are likely not too great and probably loaded with an interface that sucks worse ass and breaks more often. Tricky all around.

      • BubbleMonkey@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        If we had high speed rail, I’d absolutely love to take a train to just go places, but cross country trains in the US take absolutely forever. If you aren’t in a hurry, sure, great option, cheap, but doesn’t really work well for vacations or emergencies or whatever when you have very limited time.

        For example, Chicago to Seattle takes 46 hours by train but 30 hours by car. Even with stops for food, gas, and bathroom, even staying somewhere for the night, you aren’t adding 16 hours on.

        https://www.amtrak.com/empire-builder-train

        We really need to invest more in high speed rail… like everywhere here. Until then, unfortunately, I doubt people will shift that way overall.