When Adobe Inc. released its Firefly image-generating software last year, the company said the artificial intelligence model was trained mainly on Adobe Stock, its database of hundreds of millions of licensed images. Firefly, Adobe said, was a “commercially safe” alternative to competitors like Midjourney, which learned by scraping pictures from across the internet.

But behind the scenes, Adobe also was relying in part on AI-generated content to train Firefly, including from those same AI rivals. In numerous presentations and public postsabout how Firefly is safer than the competition due to its training data, Adobe never made clear that its model actually used images from some of these same competitors.

  • Balder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    I suppose the AI images submitted are done so because they turned out good, so there’s still a human selection process there. It’s not as bad at automatically feeding random generated images into the training.

    • PapstJL4U@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      But are they? The amount must be minuscle as searching and selecting costs time. What impact can thoughtful selected images have?