Elon Musk‘s erratic posting on X, formerly Twitter, has come back to haunt him once again as a 22-year-old Jewish man pursues a defamation case over tweets in which the tech mogul baselessly suggested the recent college graduate was an undercover federal agent posing as a neo-Nazi during a street fight between far-right groups. Musk’s excruciating March 27 deposition in the matter, which a judge ordered released to the public over the objections of the CEO’s lawyer, reveals the extent to which he has continually sabotaged both himself and the social media platform he owns.

  • Ragdoll X@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    An entertaining read that further cements Musk as an honest-to-god unhinged idiot. I’ve seen a lot of people speculate that him buying Twitter and tanking its value was some kind of genius plot, but the simpler explanation is that he’s just unironically stupid and a bad businessman.

    The fact that he has another burner account which he uses to get around blocks and hurl insults at others is both really funny and completely expected. I’m willing to bet a signed dollar that he has yet another alt that he uses to lean even further right and say the N-word on a regular basis.

        • CatOnTheChainWax@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Another old rich white guy identifying as a gay black man online?.. curious…🤣💯… interesting…true… concerning…WE MUST RECLAIM RHODESIA’S INDEPENDENCE…uhh sorry that was the AI making a post on my account, now as I was saying about population collapse…

    • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      The fact that people think that he didn’t buy twitter because he thought he could print more money is frightening

      • die444die@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Umm, some things are more important than money, namely, power. He bought twitter because it allows him to silence critics and break up a social media platform that was allowing citizens globally to communicate and take stands against governments.

    • xantoxis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      There’s a third explanation: He’s a fairly bad businessman but Twitter was always expected to lose money, and the purpose of owning it is to use it as a cost center for massive political influence.

      I’m not necessarily espousing this theory, I have no real evidence either way, but lots of billionaires buy media outlets so they can direct public sentiment. Twitter, managed correctly, could have been a pretty good way to do that, but even within that lens it has been managed very badly, so IDK

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      He is an actual idiot.

      When his name first became popular, I was like others thinking, hey, this guy sounds like a genius, maybe I should pay attention. Then I did pay attention and he ventured into my industry: comp sci and user experience. That’s when I realised he was an utter moron. When you know more about what he’s talking about than he does, it becomes obvious.

    • pissedatyall@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      …the simpler explanation is that he’s just unironically stupid and a bad businessman.

      Occam’s Razor.

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It does seem like he’s ignorant on many subjects, but if he is a complete idiot, how did he manage to make the right investments to become among the richest of the world?
      Because of dad’s money (it seems there’s no clear information about the money from the mine https://www.snopes.com/news/2022/11/17/elon-musk-emerald-mine/)? That’s a good start, sure, but many smart people, with a similar good start or more, try to become richer and don’t reach this level. So what’s the additional element?
      Is it really not an acceptable explanation that he had good guts at detecting the bubbles and did multiple smart investments at the right times (early internet website, internet payment, electric cars, low cost space)?
      Let’s try to have an opinion of a higher quality than what Musk usually writes on his media, that is to say, not solely based on some strong feelings.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        7 months ago

        I believe a combination of inertia and “throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks” may be applicable here.

        If his recent ventures are anything to go by, he’s an “idea guy” that makes a convincing case of sounding smart enough to succeed. He makes big promises about revolutionizing something, and because of his persona as a successful inventor, investors and fans buy into those ideas.

        With support behind him, he’s free to burn other people’s money in the hopes that one of his fantastical projects actually succeeds. And if it doesn’t, just sweep it under the rug like the Hyperloop.

        Or, you know, he could always use his capital to fund others’ ideas and then take credit as though they were his original idea, like with Tesla.

          • Promethiel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yes. Cunning =/= intelligence. A rat can reach the center of the maze off the smell of the cheese, not an understanding of geometry or topography.

            • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Aren’t there thousands of rich born cunning “rats” that didn’t make as much?

              • Promethiel@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                As much

                Did I fucking stutter? It’s a function of mass of capital + opportunity (Peter Thiel wants your booty hole) = Inertia which breeds either people like you spending time on the defense of the morally reprehensible. Assuming you’re not the man himself, fucker has the right amount of time.

                One again, mass of capital + opportunity (luck) = Inertia persistent enough for fucks like you to eat off perpetuity in the hope of scraps.

                • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Please refrain from personal attacks. I understand your point otherwise.
                  I’m not defending him, I even negatively criticized him two times in my initial comment. I’m defending having a rational opinion about him, but it’s very hard, as you can observe by your own reaction to my questioning.

                  • Promethiel@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    The fact that not all rats are given a maze with cheese in the middle to run to, should not require explanation to any moderately affected by the human condition person. You are owed basic respect in the form of your thoughts being listened to and your place as a person respected.

                    You are however, owed nothing, when it comes to civility.

                    That is a social contract.

                    One which you strain by repeatedly being contrarian to the point it’s either a sign of extreme neurodivergence (fine, my attitude isn’t normal either), or just disingenuous.

                    In the case of the later, pound sand. If the former, do you have any actual doubts left as to why people feel this way? Or can I ask you to get the fuck off my sunlight yet, Elon?

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        He frequently picked markets where he was bought out for hefty sums and the rest is government contracts. Tesla was the first thing bought that shipped a somewhat usable product and you can see what he’s done to it.

        He could have ruled the EV market but he had to ship inferior products, waste money crushing unions, overstate its capabilities, and now Tesla has a bunch of cars they can’t sell.

      • Traister101@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        What right investments? He was born into money and failed into getting anything from his X.com (banking!) website which was bought out by PayPal long after he was fired. The only reason he got anything out of that at all was he’d kept the stocks around.

        He “invested” in Tesla so that he could get a cool car (he royally fucked over the actual founders in the process).

        Low cost space? Low cost space? Do you live on Mars or some shit? Every one of those “Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly” events cost over one Billion. That ain’t cheap buddy.

        • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s quite the opposite of the nuanced discussion I stupidly tried to have, but I guess your comment was not serious.

            • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              My point is becoming that rich does mean some skills and cannot be achieved by a total idiot as stated in the top comment.

                • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I think mostly communication, since his multiple frauds cases show he’s not actually good at business, and having some instinctive understanding of what he should say to appeal to the poor uneducated white people who are afraid of falling lower. I feel like in the case of Trump, it’s even more important to not use his populist and hate based tactics.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    I think mostly communication,

                    Oh yes, those excellent communication skills.

                    Look, having nuclear — my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart — you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I’m one of the smartest people anywhere in the world — it’s true! — but when you’re a conservative Republican they try — oh, do they do a number — that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune — you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged — but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me — it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are — nuclear is so powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what’s going to happen and he was right, who would have thought? — but when you look at what’s going on with the four prisoners — now it used to be three, now it’s four — but when it was three and even now, I would have said it’s all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don’t, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years — but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us, this is horrible.

                    https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/donald-trump-sentence/