• Sybil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    they don’t need to approve 100 but letting 6 or 7 through is possible

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why would the Senate even let one extra justice through?

      You would need 51% of them to do that. Which would necessarily either include Manchin and Sinema or two Republicans. If you honestly believe either of those scenarios would result in even increasing the size of SCOTUS to 10 justices, you really don’t understand the U.S. government.

      • Sybil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        of 100 candidates having to go through all the consent hearings, I think they would come to an agreement about a few

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Why would they come to an agreement on any of them? What would compel Sinema and Manchin to agree to expand the court by a single justice? And if not them, name the two Republicans who would please.

          • Sybil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            imagine the immense opportunity. I don’t know how they wouldn’t all think about the power being given to them. the pool of candidates. the legacy. but Biden won’t even nominate 2 more because he doesn’t actually care.