FatCat@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoBrave just released their own privacy-preserving AI assistant named Leo.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up148arrow-down148file-text
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageBrave just released their own privacy-preserving AI assistant named Leo.lemmy.worldFatCat@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square28fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareFatCat@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down9·1 year agoEvery AI company uses copyrighted material to train their AI and there is nothing wrong with that, as long as they obtain it legally.
minus-squareSekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down2·1 year agoIf you think something being legal automatically makes it not-wrong, I don’t trust you on… well, much of anything, but especially privacy
minus-squareTheEntity@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoObtaining it legally is one thing. Using it according to the license is at least just as important. Specifically if they trained it on content under GNU GPL or Creative Commons SA licenses, I’d like the result published under these licenses too.
Every AI company uses copyrighted material to train their AI and there is nothing wrong with that, as long as they obtain it legally.
If you think something being legal automatically makes it not-wrong, I don’t trust you on… well, much of anything, but especially privacy
Obtaining it legally is one thing. Using it according to the license is at least just as important. Specifically if they trained it on content under GNU GPL or Creative Commons SA licenses, I’d like the result published under these licenses too.