Prowlarr returns There was an error loading this page when I click on an app and other sites. When I disable proton pass, it works as usual. Any idea how to solve it?

Permission denied to access property "matches"
  at toArray( (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/focus-lock/dist/es2015/utils/tabUtils.js:8:26)
  at toArray( (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/focus-lock/dist/es2015/utils/tabUtils.js:7:59)
  at parents.reduce(function (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/focus-lock/dist/es2015/utils/tabUtils.js:22:64)
  at parents.reduce(function (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/focus-lock/dist/es2015/utils/tabUtils.js:20:19)
  at getAllTabbableNodes (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/focus-lock/dist/es2015/utils/DOMutils.js:31:43)
  at getAllTabbableNodes (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/focus-lock/dist/es2015/focusMerge.js:37:41)
  at setFocus (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/focus-lock/dist/es2015/setFocus.js:21:34)
  at withinHost (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-focus-lock/dist/es2015/Trap.js:125:23)
  at lastTrap.returnFocus (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-focus-lock/dist/es2015/Trap.js:260:4)
  at reducePropsToState(mountedInstances.map(function (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-clientside-effect/lib/index.es.js:34:6)
  at componentDidUpdate (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-clientside-effect/lib/index.es.js:57:8)
  at Yi (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.min.js:219:501)
  at try{for (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.min.js:259:159)
  at unstable_next (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/scheduler/cjs/scheduler.production.min.js:18:342)
  at eg (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.min.js:122:324)
  at Uj (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.min.js:252:281)
  at Lj (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.min.js:243:370)
  at jg (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.min.js:123:114)
  at unstable_next (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/scheduler/cjs/scheduler.production.min.js:18:342)
  at eg (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.min.js:122:324)
  at jg (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.min.js:123:63)
  at eg (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.min.js:122:427)
  at Hb (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.min.js:292:100)
  at $c (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.min.js:73:354)
  • Alk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Does bitwarden allow me to automatically create a new randomized email address for every new saved login I create, that forwards to my secret main address? That’s the main thing that’s keeping me with Proton. Every online account is a different email. When I start getting spam because one leaked, I simply delete that email address, problem solved. Something like the Gmail plus thing doesn’t work since I can’t arbitrarily delete an alias that way when I want to.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I have a domain with a catchall email address and just make up something random myself every time I’m signing up for a new site.

      • bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        From looking over that page, it looks like they explain how to use such aliases, but don’t provide an alias service themselves, which it looks like Proton Pass does.

          • bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Someone said

            Does bitwarden allow me to automatically create a new randomized email address for every new saved login

            And I’m questioning that based on the page in the “yes” link reply, suggesting that the provided page is not evidence that they do.

            I don’t follow how your reply relates to that.