QueenCute@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前Good girl ethicslemmy.worldimagemessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up1314arrow-down18
arrow-up1306arrow-down1imageGood girl ethicslemmy.worldQueenCute@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square10fedilink
minus-squarehughperman@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·edit-21 年前Incorrect, there is no debate Ethical relativity states that the goodness of dogs is absolute regardless of the frame of reference
minus-squareh6a@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 年前There IS such thing as aether in the Theory of Moral Relativity: dogs.
minus-squareQueenCute@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 年前hm well I agree with you, but some people have a weird frame of reference that makes them imagine the concept of a “bad dog”
Incorrect, there is no debate
Ethical relativity states that the goodness of dogs is absolute regardless of the frame of reference
There IS such thing as aether in the Theory of Moral Relativity: dogs.
hm well I agree with you, but some people have a weird frame of reference that makes them imagine the concept of a “bad dog”