“It’s clear that activist investors and activist investor groups can effect change, and that they are taken seriously. If shareholders want to wield influence as a weapon, but their vote at the annual meeting is not enough - then an AIG can have much more freedom to solicit proposals and to seek comment and response from a board of directors.”
… it would be folly to dismiss and not look into.
Edit: for anyone reading and in the Discord channel, see here for some of the latest information related to the subject.
I’m sorry, I don’t understand your comment.
Generalities, quips, and a lack of sourcing doesn’t help. You are encouraged to contribute in a more substantial, credible manner, though.
As is said from the first reply / comment here,
“It’s clear that activist investors and activist investor groups can effect change, and that they are taken seriously. If shareholders want to wield influence as a weapon, but their vote at the annual meeting is not enough - then an AIG can have much more freedom to solicit proposals and to seek comment and response from a board of directors.”
… it would be folly to dismiss and not look into.
Edit: for anyone reading and in the Discord channel, see here for some of the latest information related to the subject.