Summary

Historians suggest Democrats might have fared better against Donald Trump by embracing the economic issues championed by Senator Bernie Sanders, who has long pushed for a focus on “bread-and-butter” concerns for working-class voters.

Despite Kamala Harris’s progressive policies, polls showed Trump was favored on economic issues, particularly among working-class and Hispanic voters.

Historian Leah Wright Rigueur argued that Sanders’ messaging on economic struggles could be key for future Democratic strategies.

Sanders himself criticized the party for “abandoning” the working class, which he said has led to a loss of support across racial lines.

    • Vespair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes, but people forgot that his real message was to get out there an be the change. Bernie’s message was never about relying on or believing in the Democrats, it was that change only happens when we mobilize.

      He told us to get out there and run ourselves and get personally involved and invested in our local politics so we can be the revolution… We just chose not to listen to him.

    • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It is not the voters job to embrace a progressive modern platform nor is it their job to get themselves energized over said policies

      But both parties have shoved that false belief down voters throats that is the voters’ faults when they fail to deliver

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        In a democracy, it sure as Hell is the voters’ job to do all that. And more, for that matter.

        In fact, the voters should be controlling the parties (if not abolishing them entirely), not the other way around!

        • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          No no no, the Democratic Party is some magical uncontrollable entity, we must abandon it, making progressive change infinitely more difficult.

          /s if it wasn’t obvious. Banana is a bad faith agitator. They desired a GOP victory.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It was the DNC’s job to be clear about Bernie’s message. I voted for him in the 2016 primary even though I was bombarded with “radical socialist regressive left” Bernie articles in my social media feeds at the time.

        Unfortunately, most Americans don’t actively seek out information and just accept the picture painted by the news that’s fed to them.

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It was the DNC’s job to be clear about Bernie’s message.

          LOL the DNC has actively fought against Bernie’s message.

        • Deceptichum@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          You lot gave everyone Trump by refusing to listen to voters concerns.

          You apparently have still not learnt.

          • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Lol I actually voted and voted for Harris. FWIW I’m also a former Republican who voted for Trump in ‘16.

            If I’m able to fucking learn then so will all these morons who stayed home and didn’t vote because of either their apathy or “principles”.

            Those people gave Trump the path to the White House again.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Lol I actually voted and voted for Harris. FWIW I’m also a former Republican who voted for Trump in ‘16.

              Oh look, it’s the only voter Harris cared about.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Why does it matter if Harris cared about my vote?

                  Because seeking votes is what campaigning is.

                  I did my job. Did you?

                  I voted for Harris. Harris didn’t do hers. She ran to the right and alienated the left.

                  Me and others like me warned what would happen as a result, and it was interpreted in all cases as trump support. Got called Russians so often that c/politics eventually made a rule forbidding it. Centrists thought they knew better. Thought that genocide had popular support. Thought that Dick Cheney’s endorsement was a win. No one likes Dick Cheney. Even Republicans hated him before the endorsement. The constant abuse aimed at Muslim voters left Trump an in-road that he exploited. Pretending that the economy was fine and that everything was better now, after all the inflation that it sure as fuck looked like the Biden administration just sat back and watched.

                  Not to mention the very public failures of the Biden administration on labor: Failing to pass BBB, killing the minimum wage increase, and breaking the rail strike. The Biden administration earned the distrust of workers, and it doesn’t matter how fair you think that is. Harris didn’t do a damned thing to differentiate herself from him on this issue. More of the same was untenable, worse was the only alternative, so people stayed home because they weren’t being represented by either party, and one was insulting them and telling them that they weren’t struggling because the economy was working fine for billionaires.

                  Hell, the only daylight between Harris and Biden was when she moved to his right. Promising to appoint a Republican to her Cabinet. Campaigning with Liz Cheney. Even Biden wasn’t that tonedeaf.

                  We warned you. We kept warning you because we knew what was at stake. You were all so fucking pigheaded that you refused to listen.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve been saying that since the DNC fucked him over in the 2016 election. I voted for Biden, then Harris, but I never fucking forgot who’s to blame for the state of things now.

  • Vespair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    If we had run Bernie in 2016, Trump would still be nothing but a punchline.

        • vga@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s one think to think that Sanders is correct, but to think that the American people would have voted for him in 2016 is just extremely delusional.

  • bquintb@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I usually vote along with the democrats, but neoliberals are so freaking elitist and clueless. As much as it pisses me off that I’m going to have to deal with whatever fascist bs Trump has in store, it’s really quite nice seeing them get their asses handed to them by a populist… It’s just too bad it wasn’t a left-wing populist.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    In hindsight it seems obvious, but to be honest I really thought Kamala would have fared better.

    • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      To me the main takeaway is that I live in a completely separate reality from most voters. I would have voted on a dead dog over Trump. He is mean, narcissistic and never shows any empathy. On top of that he is clearly losing his wits. If a majority of voters prefers a candidate like this, is even enthusiastic to vote for him, what can you do?

      I also know that Lemmy skews left, but I think we have to face the fact that most voters have no ability to empathise with those worse off. There is no left wing politics without empathy and solidarity. What most of us here want is dead.

        • cmbabul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          This is true to an extent. Social media made it much easier to spread misinformation that allowed for the total shattering of consensus reality. Which had been under intense duress for the better part of a century anyways

    • Tyfud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      We all did, you’re not wrong.

      It’s a sad reality we all woke up to on Wednesday. Learning that the majority of Americans are ignorant, racist, misogynistic, selfish assholes.

      • Resonosity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        When you mean “all”, I wonder who you group in that conception.

        Not all of us believed Kamala would win. A good group of people were calling out Kamala’s shit since the DNC, and everything since. With the direction of the campaign, you had a good chance to predict Kamala’s underperformance.

        Let’s not kid ourselves here.

      • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        We all did

        No, we did not “all” think so, a lot of us have been saying this for quite a while. In fact since at least the 2016 election cycle started in 2015.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is what many said in 2016 after Clinton lost but we still did it again in 2020 and yet again in 2024. If I were a betting man I’d say that if there’s sill an election worth having in 2028 we’ll see another, even further right leaning, centrist Democrat win the nomination.

      • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yoyo look, this guy’s fucking nostradamus up in here, right? It’s gonna happen just like this.

        I’m thinking newsome is the “perfect” candidate for 28.

        Whoever it is, I bet you, just like me can’t wait to be told how stupid i am and actually great they are by credulous online political minds who call parroting the pundits talking points word-for-word fucking theory

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It was also copium. After the infamous debate we all knew Biden wouldn’t win and had made a mistake.

      The fact that he actually backed down just gave a lot of enthusiasm to what could come next. It was historic and made us all stop focusing on the fact that he should have never ran for 2024 in the first place.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The fact that he actually backed down just gave a lot of enthusiasm to what could come next.

        The fact that the party listened just fucking once was what generated the enthusiasm. That died when it became crystal clear that no further listening would happen.

  • Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    We tried. Biden’s Build Back Better bill had a lot of pro-working class stuff in it. We just couldn’t pass it with Manchin and Sinema resisting.

    Details are important.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t really know how the Democratic Party is expected to steer out of the center-right ditch, though. With all the dark money calling the shots, I mean. Bernie is the exception that proves the rule.

    The electorate is actually far more progressive on the issues than the corporate media lets on. But the minute the Democratic Party were to embrace Bernie-style positions? You can bet that not only the “liberal media” would declare this sO vErY eXtReMe, but all the big money would be spending against them, and spending against them hard. Think it’s bad now where crypto, Elon, and the Washington Post are tilting against the Democrats? Imagine they actually embraced progressives…

    Not saying I love it, I just don’t know what the answer is.

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The thing is, we’ve seen what the working class wants: Not concrete policy that will help them, but to have their feelings of struggle, outrage, and anger acknowledged and reflected back to them.

      The Democrats could have radical pro-worker, pro-working-class reforms in their policy platform, but if what they’re broadcasting is “things are great” energy, or “there are bigger fish to fry” energy, then they’re going to get ignored.

      The Democrat’s talking points have focused on the health of American institutions. That’s the thing they’ve repeatedly signalled is most important to them.

      It’s not what’s most important to most households. It’s actually pretty far removed from the top of their lists of concerns.

    • wellheh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      At this point maybe the democrats just need to embrace these hard positions and normalize them. The gop doesn’t appear to care how radical their stances are and they get votes regardless of the racism. Trump’s whole shtick has been normalizing bad behavior and gaslighting the other party into thinking any wrong they do is a gotcha- they’re operating on two very different rulesets.

  • boaratio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s the real problem with historians. They always talk about the past and not the future.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    You guys need to think of the DNC as more of a for profit business.

    From that perspective, they were super successful in making so much money.

    Remember, there can be more money made when you intentionally lose, similar to butch in pulp fiction.