• linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Wait

    “Our community has literally cooked 100s of millions of times with our app. Unfortunately, each connected cook costs us money.”

    The cooker, It’s FUCKING Bluetooth. It doesn’t need to call home, it can’t call home. The App, It has a list of 35 different sous vide recipes that could live on the app. The app has no business calling home, they don’t need a server.

    • Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      And if each did cost them money - they’ve been paid when the stupid thing was purchased!

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, it’s a $200 heater. Probably $30 in parts. You can run a small cluster for the profit in a few sales a month.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s a cooker. Why the hell does it even need bluetooth, let alone an internet connection?

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      They need if they were to push firmware updates via the app that are then installed over Bluetooth, like some headphones do. But that should be a free service, and also optional. I don’t really see any groundbreaking functionality added for a device that’s basically a submerged motor with a temperature probe.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s a decade old cooking appliance .

        What possible firmware updates could it need at this point?

  • kevindqc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I haven’t used the app in a while and opened it and saw this… Well never buying Anova again

    But hey at least they gave me a coupon that expired two months ago.

    • Fester@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Imagine seeing that message and buying another product from them.

      “It’s time to artificially create waste. Don’t worry, you won’t see this message again. Our new cookers are designed to not last 10 years.”

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ung

          (Don’t) hope they did their math right and the “well, it’s just $2/mo” crowd is large enough to offset the principled crowd

          • ripcord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            That notice doesn’t even say there is a $2/mo option. App just won’t work at all.

    • SpacePirate@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Actively encouraging people to toss perfectly good hardware to fuel their subscription bullshit… and these guys weren’t even recently bought by a VC firm or anything?

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        They were bought by Electrolux in 2017, and have been enshittifying ever since. Cheaper, lower quality parts, etc. They’re just profiting from the brand as they turn it to shit. Never buy their products.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I can’t imagine why these things even need an app.

      You have to set the thing up with water and all, just hit the buttons on the device.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I have never bought an appliance or physical product that requires an app to use, and I never will until our society has deteriorated to the the point where there is no alternative to that in order to get by in it. It’s almost at that point already with smartphones but for now it’s still possible to get by without one.

  • Media Sensationalism@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I passed on a lot of the fancier apartment buildings for requiring an app and a cell phone to gain access to your own home. I shouldn’t have to agree to an arbitration/class action waiver to use my own front door, I don’t feel comfortable with management getting a notification on their phone every time I come or go, I don’t like the fact that 20+ listed partner companies have access to sensitive personal data, and I shouldn’t have to wait for maintenance to show up in the middle of the night because I couldn’t make it back home before my personal tracking device died on me.

    The sad thing is that most of these locking units cost these apartments hundreds of dollars each on top of a monthly subscription.

  • harsh3466@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Translation:

    “Fuck you for not replacing your perfectly fine and still working 10 year old machine and making our line go up more. We’re gonna do our best to brick it because we want all of your money.”

    Fuck capitalism. I will (and have been) doing my absolute to avoid buying any kind of physical device that requires an app to function

  • ripcord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I personally think it’s perfectly reasonable for a company to eventually start charging for a service they provide that costs them money to provide. They might bakenin some number of years into the product price, but they can’t keep providing the service for free forever.

    It seems like something that should be expected if we do want certain services to be provided and maintained. Heck, I also think that offering a subscription is better than the usual alternative, which is that the company just shuts the service down.

    However, the way this is done is almost always slimy and shitty and likely is only going to get solved by regulation.

    • It’s incredibly rare that IOT devices NEED cloud integration. Most of the time it really SHOULD just be local-only, or have a local option.
    • If they are going to start charging for something to continue to work, unless there was already an explicit agreement that - and when - this would happen, they need to provide an alternative.
      • Either documentation or open software for how an alternate cloud - including local - could be used instead.
    • That info really should be mandatory to be made available beforehand in case the company shuts down.
    • The subscription fee needs to be reasonable.
      • Personally, I think $24/year is still far too much, but it’s still WAY more reasonable than some I’ve seen.

    Should be a no-brainer.

    • Lianodel@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Same. I’ve been thinking of replacing the cheap immersion circulator we have, and was going to go with Anova. This blatant enshittification is enough to make me look elsewhere.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I will never throw a brick through the headquarters of Anova, nor would I advocate for others doing it.

  • auzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh ffs… This is the one I have…

    And, you know what? The firmware sucks.

    You can’t even connect to wifi if you have two AP’s with the same name (which is literally everyone).

    I haven’t even installed the app in ages because it’s a PITA and has never worked 100%.

    But, they can guarantee my next one won’t be an anova again. There are much cheaper alternatives now

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      “Be evil so they have to stomp us out” shouldn’t be a standard. Stop allowing a world that rewards villains. Stop being a villain.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Coulda woulda shoulda…

        People either accept the reality and act on it or keep getting fucked over because the world “shouldn’t work like this”