• floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    It’s astonishing many organizations in wealthy democracies are terrified of the slightest criticism of Israel’s genocide.

    • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Even the Israeli government pretends to be sad that journalists die covering wars. They’re more extreme than this?

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      cake
      OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Because once that door swings open a little bit… who knows what might bear some scrutiny?

      Who made the clothes you’re wearing? Or your phone? Were they a slave? A child? Are they even still alive, or do they have cancer because of the factory where they worked? Do their parents miss them, if they’re gone?

      What happened to make the chicken sandwich you had at lunch? Are you complicit in slow torture unto death, just by existing in the modern world?

      Better to keep the door shut tight, and attack the messenger if anyone has anything to say about it. We’re just making music here. No torture, no killing, no profit from the destruction of lives. Just music! Trust me. Enjoy.

      (I don’t think most people are like this. I actually think most people in the West at this point are against the “war” in Gaza, to at least some tepidly inactive degree. But certainly, also, a lot of people aren’t against it, q.v. this article.)

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        People talk regularly about those things and nobody gets cancelled over that. It’s only the Israel lobby that made talking about Palestine equal to anti-Semitism, no matter how mild (like in this case).

        • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
          cake
          OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Well… yeah, that’s a fair point. The strength of Israel’s lobby has a ton to do with it (and lobbies like China can accomplish the same types of things). It’s 100% true.

  • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Here’s what they cancelled him for:

    for piano

    duration: 5’00"

    2024

    for Jayson Gillham

    dedicated to the journalists of Gaza

    I acknowledge the Wurundjeri Woi Wurrung people of the Kulin Nation, Traditional Custodians of the lands where I live, work, and create – lands on which First Nations communities have been creating and sharing music, art and culture for thousands of generations. I pay my respects to their Elders past and present, and I recognise the vital ongoing contributions First Nations communities continue to make on our music and arts scenes. This always was, and always will be, Aboriginal land.

    I also acknowledge all Indigenous Peoples worldwide, their continued fight for freedom from settler-colonialism and occupation, and recognise the interconnectedness of these, all struggles for justice and work towards a world free from oppression for all everyone.

    He didn’t even dedicate it to journalists killed, just journalists. The headline is bullshit.

    He never mentioned Israel.

    EDIT: It just occurred to me that he wasn’t canceled for dedicating it to the journalists of Gaza. He was cancelled for calling Aboriginal people victims of settler-colonialism in Australia, which is objectively true…

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The article quotes him saying more:

      The five-minute piece is dedicated to the journalists of Gaza and was written for Gillham, according to D’Netto’s website. On Wednesday morning, Gillham’s team released the full transcript of what he said while introducing Witness.

      “Over the last 10 months, Israel has killed more than one hundred Palestinian journalists,” Gillham told the crowd on Sunday.

      “A number of these have been targeted assassinations of prominent journalists as they were travelling in marked press vehicles or wearing their press jackets. The killing of journalists is a war crime in international law, and it is done in an effort to prevent the documentation and broadcasting of war crimes to the world.

      “In addition to the role of journalists who bear witness, the word Witness in Arabic is Shaheed, which also means Martyr.”

    • Numberone@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Oh, the IOF said it? Must be true 😂. The only thing they say concretely and sourced in the article is that he worked at a “pro Hamas” media outlet (can’t speak to this claim, but remember all the other things the IOF has claimed are Hamas), and that he wrote a piece for Al Jazeera.

      Disregarding all that. Assuming that this guy was a journalist who was also a gun carrying member of Hamas and held actual hostages in his house, does that say anything about the record number of journalists that have been assasinated by the IOF?

      I think it pretty clearly doesn’t.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    The article goes into depth with the artists remarks. Its nowhere close to something like: “This next piece is dedicated to the journalists killed in Gaza” which is what I would have assumed.

    • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      He provided context as to why that piece would be performed. I don’t think he went over the top at all.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Can I ask would you hold the same position that his statements should have been allowed if it was in strong support of the violence against the people in Gaza? Do you support the use of this platform because you agree with the position or because you believe he should be able to voice whatever position he wants? Would you be in support if his opinions were on White nationalism?

        edit: Calm down people, I don’t support Israel nor white nationalism. I’m probing where @[email protected] 's limits are for what they a believe is acceptable. I’m not advocating for any political position with my questions.

        • takenaps@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          The main point here is being against the violence, of which israel is largely responsible. Your questions detract from that & minimize the problems to a matter of personal opinion

          • xhrit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            The main point here is being against the violence, of which israel is largely responsible.

            The violence began before israel even existed. Israel is not responsible for violence against jews.

              • xhrit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Hamas issues press passes to its military spotters. The transmission of military intel makes people valid targets under the laws of war. That is a valid excuse for bombing journalists.